arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.26270

Sample-Smooth Spaces: A Convenient Category for Differentiable Probabilistic Programming

Abstract

We introduce the category $\mathbf{SSS}$ of sample-smooth spaces over a mixed site. The test objects are the products $Ω_n := \mathbb{R}^n \times Ω$ of a Cartesian space with the universal Hilbert cube $Ω$ carrying all universally measurable sets, and a space is a set with a family of admissible plots $Ω_n \to \mathcal{X}$ closed under precomposition. Smoothness and measurability are then not two structures glued along an axiom, but one structure over one site. The site has finite non-empty products, because $Ω$ absorbs its own square; its Karoubi envelope contains every $\mathbb{R}^n$; and it has mixed morphisms $ω\mapsto (W(ω),Φ(ω))$, which turn measurability of a smooth family from an axiom into a consequence. $\mathbf{SSS}$ is a concrete quasitopos: complete, cocomplete, cartesian closed and locally cartesian closed, with a classifier for embeddings. Morphisms of Cartesian spaces are exactly the $C^\infty$ maps and manifolds embed full and faithfully, both without Boman's theorem. Every object has tangent and cotangent spaces, every morphism a differential. The modalities sit in an adjoint string $Π\dashv \flat \dashv \natural \dashv \sharp \dashv Λ$, making $\mathbf{SSS}$ cohesive over quasi-universal spaces. The point is the probability monad. Defining the plots of $\mathsf{P}(\mathcal{X})$ as push-forwards of $\mathcal{X}$-plots at every test object, $\mathsf{P}$ is an unconditional strong commutative affine monad on all of $\mathbf{SSS}$ -- functor, unit, product of kernels, multiplication and the monad laws are each one line of seed splitting -- and its Kleisli category, of differentiable simulators, is a Markov category. The reparametrisation trick holds by construction: every Kleisli morphism is plot-wise a sampler, stably under composition. A reflection theorem locates the whole gain in a single plot family.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Patrick Forré. 2026-08-14. Sample-Smooth Spaces: A Convenient Category for Differentiable Probabilistic Programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Categorical Generalization of Counterpoint

We extend Mazzola's counterpoint model using category theory, generalizing from the category $\mathbf{Set}$ to an arbitrary topos other than $\mathbf{Set}$. This generalization suggests that counterpoint's essential structure depends on specific categorical conditions rather than classical set-theoretic reasoning. A key contribution is identifying sufficient requirements for a well-behaved counterpoint theory in a topos: some version of Zorn's Lemma (GJZL), and two-valuedness and split supports (NS). Within a topos, we introduce (weak) quasidichotomies alongside the classical notion of dichotomy. These structures capture varying degrees of oppositional structure between consonance and dissonance, with weak quasidichotomies preserving the non-Boolean flexibility essential to musical practice while quasidichotomies represent maximal opposition short of complete partition. We prove a generalized counterpoint theorem giving sufficient conditions for the existence of admitted successors. When the ambient topos turns non-zero successor objects into points, admitted succession can be iterated to form counterpoint paths, which may terminate at consonances with no admitted successor. The framework naturally accommodates counterpoint with sets instead of pure pitches, relaxing the ``yes/no'' character of classical consonance definitions and emphasizing context-dependence. Mazzola's model allows a Kuratowski closure operator induced by a polarity, which defines an internal topology enabling algebraic-topological analysis of counterpoint structure. We conclude by showing this construction generalizes to involutive morphisms. This categorical approach provides foundations for understanding both the historical evolution of contrapuntal practice and cross-cultural divergences in interval organization.

math.CT

From 3-crossed modules to Gray-type 4-categories

In this paper, we investigate the relation between the category of 3-crossed modules and the category of Gray-type 4-groups. The notion of a 3-crossed module was first introduced by Arvasi \textit{et al.}, motivated by the question of what kind of algebraic structure completely encodes a homotopy 4-type. On the other hand, from the point of view that higher groups are equivalent to algebraic realizations of higher categories -- as exemplified by the relationship between 2-crossed modules and Gray 3-groups established by Sarikaya--Ulualan -- it had not been clear how the 3-crossed modules of Arvasi \textit{et al.} relate to any higher category. In our previous paper, we proposed a new definition of a 3-crossed module and observed that it admits a natural interpretation in terms of higher categories. In this paper, we make this interpretation precise: we introduce a 4-category, which reduces to a semistrict braided monoidal 2-category when restricted to a single object and a single 1-morphism, and prove that the category of our 3-crossed modules is equivalent to the category of Gray 4-groups, defined as single-object versions of this 4-category in which all morphisms are invertible. We therefore expect that these structures can correctly capture the topological nature of surface knots and higher-dimensional manifolds.

math.CT

Observations on the variety of equationally linear Heyting semilattices

In previous work, we analysed a number of categorical properties, of interest in the context of Janelidze-Márki-Tholen semi-abelian categories, for the variety $\mathsf{HSLat}$ of Heyting semilattices. In this paper, we focus on the subvariety $\mathsf{ELHSLat}$ of equationally linear Heyting semilattices. Our main objective is to show that, unlike $\mathsf{HSLat}$, this category is algebraically coherent. We furthermore prove that it is neither locally algebraically cartesian closed nor cosmash associative.

math.CT