The Doctrine as Fixed Point: Endogenous Penalty Enforcement, Multiplicity, and the Irreversibility of Capital Shocks in Markets for Expert Services

Abstract

In markets for expert services under improving AI, separation through an outcome-contingent liability commitment survives only if the enforceable multiple of actual loss, $m$, is large enough. That literature, including our own, treats $m$ as a legal datum. It is not. Post-Cavendish the enforceable multiple is measured against the legitimate interest the clause protects; where that interest is the preservation of human fallback capability, the interest exists only if the commitment separates, which requires a large enough $m$. We close the loop and study the resulting doctrine map $m' = D(m)$. Six results follow. First, $D$ is monotone on a complete lattice, so a fixed point exists, and it is unique unless the maximal doctrinal uplift exceeds four times the dispersion of the case-level threshold; when multiplicity obtains there are generically three fixed points, of which the outer two are stable. Second, calibration from primary legal sources yields a taxonomy: the United States and negotiated German B2B contracting are determinate regimes; England and, since BPL v Morgan Securities (2025), India are multiple regimes with a watershed at 1.95. Third, the doctrine map inherits the solvency cap, so the equilibrium ceiling is discontinuous where the solvency ratio crosses the watershed, falling by 0.92. Fourth, the collapse is irreversible: restoring capacity does not restore the doctrine; under an endogenous doctrine the companion paper's regime map polarises and its intermediate cells vanish. Fifth, idiosyncratic noise makes the long-run doctrine unique and delivers a closed-form tipping point at the midpoint of the doctrinal range, independent of the dispersion; irreversibility becomes metastable, with Kramers-exponential recovery times. Sixth, the order-theoretic core is machine-checked in Lean 4, with an axiom report of none.