arXiv · 2609.25573
We construct an explicit quaternary Legendre pair of length $64$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported construction at this length.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Harshit Verma. 2026-09-22. A Quaternary Legendre Pair of Length 64. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25573
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We consider the problem of determining if a given two-dimensional nonnegative integer matrix $M$ is the product of two such matrices, excluding trivial units. A matrix $M$ with no such factorisation is called prime and therefore belongs to the minimal (infinite rank) generator of $2 \times 2$ matrices over the natural numbers, otherwise it is called composite. We also consider the problem of finding a (non-unique) factorisation of a composite matrix. Our results have applications in computational group theory and the theory of codes, where such matrices are called incidence matrices. We analyse the complexity of primality and finding a factorisation for a composite matrix, providing a first efficient algorithm.
Notions of graph similarity provide alternative perspective on the graph isomorphism problem and vice-versa. In this paper, we consider measures of similarity arising from mismatch norms as studied in Gervens and Grohe: the edit distance $δ_{\mathcal{E}}$, and the metrics arising from $\ell_p$-operator norms, which we denote by $δ_p$ and $δ_{|p|}$. We address the following question: can these measures of similarity be used to design polynomial-time approximation algorithms for graph isomorphism? We show that computing an optimal value of $δ_{\mathcal{E}}$ is \NP-hard on pairs of graphs with the same number of edges. In addition, we show that computing optimal values of $δ_p$ and $δ_{|p|}$ is \NP-hard even on pairs of $1$-planar graphs with the same degree sequence and bounded degree. These two results improve on previous known ones, which did not examine the restricted case where the pairs of graphs are required to have the same number of edges. Finally, we study similarity problems on strongly regular graphs and prove some near optimal inequalities with interesting consequences on the computational complexity of graph and group isomorphism.
We study the number of prototypes needed to represent Boolean functions by nearest-neighbour classification. There are two distinct settings: the prototypes may be arbitrary points of Euclidean space, or they may themselves be required to lie in the Boolean cube. For unrestricted prototypes, we strengthen a known lower bound for almost all Boolean functions. The bound applies simultaneously to nearest-neighbour voting rules with any number of voting neighbours, and substantially narrows the gap with the known general upper bound. We obtain a VC-dimension bound for classes with a bounded number of prototypes, and show that it is sharp in order in dimensions at least four. We then study Boolean prototypes, beginning with symmetric threshold functions. A connection with covering designs expresses the minimum number of prototypes at every threshold level exactly in terms of a covering number, and leads to further exact results for related monotone functions, including disjunctive extensions and a characterisation of when a representation with a single negative prototype is possible. For a uniformly random Boolean function, the Boolean nearest-neighbour complexity, as a proportion of the cube, is asymptotically close either to one half or to one, with explicit limiting probabilities. In particular, almost every Boolean function requires at least approximately half as many prototypes as there are points in the cube, and one half is the largest proportion for which such a lower bound holds. Finally, we consider arbitrary symmetric Boolean functions. Their Boolean nearest-neighbour complexity is closely approximated by a weighted vertex-cover problem on paths. As a consequence, a uniformly random symmetric function typically requires prototypes amounting to $11/20$ of the cube. This is much larger than the upper bounds known when the prototypes are allowed to lie anywhere in Euclidean space.