arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.25071

Who Enters the Record? Paywalls, Contributor Selection, and Social Learning

Abstract

This paper studies social learning when buying access to previous decisions also determines whose decision enters the record. Individuals first receive private information and then decide whether to pay for access. A positive price selects relatively weak private beliefs. With one founding observation, every buyer copies it, and the record acquires no further information. With a richer initial history, buyers can disagree and the record can improve; nevertheless, a price bounded away from zero prevents complete learning, even with unbounded private beliefs. We then consider a rule under which a buyer makes a preliminary choice before access and a revised choice afterward. A positive probability of implementing the preliminary choice makes it follow the private signal. Retaining both choices restores complete learning under a fixed effective fee or pooled myopic pricing, including with bounded beliefs. The rule reduces willingness to pay and sacrifices some current decision accuracy. A worked example shows how the subsequent improvement in information can outweigh both initial losses. The results show why preserving a judgment made before exposure can change what later users learn from the same selected population.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Kovalenko, Georgy Lukyanov. 2026-09-18. Who Enters the Record? Paywalls, Contributor Selection, and Social Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25071

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Social networks, confirmation bias and shock elections

This paper links the increasing prominence of social networks in politics to recent shock election outcomes. In our setup, agents learning on a network suffer from confirmation bias -- the tendency to ignore contrary evidence to ones own belief. Our main result is that confirmation bias slows down learning in a wide class of networks. For any network, consensus fails to emerge when confirmation bias is above a threshold. We explore the implications for elections and media markets. Confirmation bias increases the likelihood of shock elections, and encourages media organizations already at the fringe to take on even more extreme views.

econ.TH↗

Screening with Discrete Types and Discrete Contracts

We study screening when both the agent's types and the contracts available to the principal are finite: Quantities and transfers are drawn from a finite integer grid, while marginal costs lie on a slightly off-set grid, with integer costs as a limit case. We compare two solution concepts, equilibrium and rationalizability. Since rationalizability does not feature an equilibrium tie-breaking convention, we analyze screening under weak and under strict incentives. We develop a discrete first-order approach and characterize the optimal menus for full-support log-concave beliefs. Optimal quantities need not be unique, but at most two adjacent quantities are optimal and multiplicity is a knife-edge case in beliefs. Our rationalizability solution concept, Delta-O rationalizability, restricts the principal's beliefs over types and requires her best replies to be robust to belief perturbations. Two rounds of elimination suffice, and the rationalizable and the equilibrium outcomes essentially coincide: The predictions of equilibrium survive without a common prior, while avoiding a tie-breaking convention.

econ.TH↗

Reduced Forms: Feasibility, Extremality, Optimality

We study independent private values auction settings with heterogeneous bidders, revenue nonlinear in interim winning probabilities, and place no ad hoc restrictions on auctions that a seller can use. We show that feasibility of interim winning probabilities is testable along a unidimensional principal curve, constructed in closed form. We then explicitly characterize the extreme points of the feasible set and the allocations that induce them. Combining these results, we solve for the optimal auction under a natural regularity condition. The optimal auction equalizes bidders' marginal revenues along its principal curve and awards the good to the bidder whose type the curve reaches first. Revenue curvature determines whether and how low types are excluded---at the intensive margin, scaling winning probabilities down, or the extensive margin, cutting them off. Applications include the linear model, endogenous valuations from ex ante investments, and non-expected utility preferences, where previous results were largely limited to symmetric environments and allocations or two bidders.

econ.TH↗