arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.25026

Local Expected Utility in Infinite-Dimensional Spaces: Theory and Elicitation

Abstract

This paper develops a decision-theoretic interpretation of local expected utility on Abstract Wiener space. The framework is intended for economic acts that are naturally stochastic paths, such as income paths, consumption paths, investment payoffs, insurance losses, or laboratory stimuli unfolding over a continuum of contingencies. In this setting the object of choice is an act or payoff path, while Hermite functions serve as state-feature coordinates rather than objects of preference. Abstract Wiener space supplies a Gaussian reference measure on the Banach space of paths and a Hilbert subspace on which local utility is represented by orthogonal coefficients. The associated Wiener-integral weights are generally signed stochastic functionals; they become admissible decision weights only after a specified nonnegative normalization. This distinction clarifies the relation between the model, state-dependent utility, subjective expected utility, rank-dependent utility, and cumulative prospect theory. The main representation result gives finite primitive conditions under which projected path-valued acts admit a normalized local-utility representation. The corresponding elicitation result identifies composite utility-weight coefficients from projected acts and recovers normalized decision weights when the local utility scale is independently elicited. The paper also states testable restrictions: normalized weights must be nonnegative, add to one, preserve monotonicity, and satisfy additional rank or gain-loss restrictions when the subjective expected utility, rank-dependent utility, or cumulative prospect theory submodels are imposed. Numerical illustrations show how the representation operates in finite approximations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G. Charles-Cadogan. 2026-08-16. Local Expected Utility in Infinite-Dimensional Spaces: Theory and Elicitation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Measurement of Trustworthiness of the Online Reviews

Online review platforms shape consumer decisions, yet reported ratings and comments may be unreliable when reviewers behave inconsistently. This paper models online reviews as a sequential choice problem and proposes a formal rationality pattern function that links a reviewer's current review to their revealed preference history. Building on a two-way consistency axiom for choices from nested sets, we derive an object-specific support trajectory and an associated degree measure in [0,1] (Average Propensity to Choose a Pattern, APCP) that quantifies review trustworthiness. The measure is designed to support information updating and reduce asymmetric information by discounting reviews that are inconsistent with past behavior. A worked example illustrates how the approach assigns trustworthiness grades to reviews for different objects and how these grades can complement aggregate rating statistics. Finally, a generalized theory has been established.

econ.TH

The Depth and Reach of Exploitation: Contracting with Endogenously Naive Consumers

Consumers can invest resources to understand and avoid their behavioral mistakes, and their incentives to do so depend on the market consequences of remaining naive. We incorporate this feedback between consumers' cognitive states and market outcomes into a general contracting model. Firms face a trade-off between the depth and reach of exploitation: deeper exploitation raises profit from a naive consumer but induces greater cognitive investment, promoting sophistication and shrinking the exploitable consumer base. This trade-off disciplines exploitation and can cause policies that benefit consumers when cognition is fixed to backfire when cognition is endogenous.

econ.TH

Contracting under Misspecification

This paper studies agency problems when both parties worry that the model linking action to output is misspecified. With observable actions, an optimal contract is linear in output, so performance pay arises solely to share misspecification exposure, the slope reflects the parties' relative robustness concerns, and its allocation is Pareto efficient. With hidden actions, this sharing rule survives and incentives add a nonlinear correction. Misspecification concerns can polarize effort by making intermediate actions impossible to implement. Moreover, ambiguity across competing models has asymmetric effects: uncertainty about desired actions raises the principal's payoff, whereas uncertainty about deviations can lower it.

econ.TH