Pushout Attachments and Conditional Complexity of Executable Models

Alexander Kolpakov

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.25024

Pushout Attachments and Conditional Complexity of Executable Models

Alexander Kolpakov

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We represent the modular enlargement of an executable model by a pushout of finite typed presentations. Adhesivity preserves the original model and recovers the shared interface, while chosen pushouts make linking functorial and coproducts describe parallel attachments. A semantic comparison gives a precise criterion for behavioral persistence. Effective linking also bounds conditional prefix complexity; under the stated canonicalization and invariance assumptions, attachment and extension codes yield the same profiles of loss against complexity, up to additive constants, and share an exact scalar envelope. The result separates syntax, semantics, ideal complexity, and concrete coding cost, and shows that a preference for modularity can arise only through restrictions on the permitted attachments.

Explore related subjects

cs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Alexander Kolpakov. 2026-08-13. Pushout Attachments and Conditional Complexity of Executable Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Deeper Look at Depth: Stable Generation Accounting for Quantifier Reasoning

SMT solvers make automated verification convenient. At the same time, solvers suffer from instability, whereby seemingly inconsequential changes to the input may cause a previously quickly produced proof to fail or time out. This paper addresses a common cause of outcome instability (i.e., unsat/unknown fluctuations) in the context of program verification. We demonstrate that the generation (i.e., depth) accounting used to make quantifier instantiation practical and implemented in multiple state-of-the-art SMT solvers is non-confluent (i.e., prone to divergence), and that this leads to instability. We then address this deficiency and develop a new accounting method that is stable. The new method is justified using a sequence of refinements from an abstract, confluent solver model all the way to our implementation in Z3. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that our implementation reduces outcome instability by 94% in the unstable core of the Mariposa benchmark without leading to performance regressions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Typed Knowledge over Constructive Institutions

Type theories designed for mathematics or program verification need only that a proposition holds; proof irrelevance in conversion erases, at the kernel level, how a claim was established. A persistent knowledge store, by contrast, must retain that record: who established a claim, by which derivation or external tool, and under which assumptions. This volume presents the theory of Eigenius---a store of typed knowledge over constructive institutions---and develops its metatheory from that requirement. The kernel theory is a dependent type theory with cumulative universes, an impredicative universe of propositions, inductive families, and an intensional identity type. Proof irrelevance is an axiom with an explicit witness rather than a conversion rule, so proofs of a proposition are provably equal yet remain distinct terms. Definitional equality is joinability under an orthogonal rewriting system---confluent, injective on type formers, and decidable by a type-free test---while a separate subsumption judgment covers universe cumulativity, codomain-covariant function types, and declared class inclusions. We prove consistency via a set-theoretic model; develop a justification logic over the kernel's propositions to track evidence and support; organize environments as an institution so that store extensions are signature morphisms and external verdicts enter via comorphisms; formulate a typed knowledge-graph theory with records, classes, and refinements; and prove the correctness of conversion, normalization by evaluation, and bidirectional type checking relative to termination. A Lean 4 formalization accompanies the volume.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

A formal specification of the jq language

jq is a widely used tool that provides a programming language to manipulate JSON data. However, the jq language is currently only specified by its implementation, making it difficult to reason about its behaviour. To this end, we provide a formal syntax and denotational semantics for a large subset of the jq language. In particular, we give a translation from jq programs to lambda terms. Our most significant contribution is to provide a new way to interpret updates that allows for more performant execution. We implement our semantics in two interpreters and evaluate the performance.

cs.LO↗