arXiv · 2609.23047
Where to Decide: Control-Plane Geometry in Coherence-Limited Quantum Networks
Abstract
Quantum networks are usually framed by two hardware limits: how fast entanglement can be heralded, and how long a memory can hold it. We establish a third, geometric limit: entanglement decoheres while control information travels, so the distance to whoever allocates resources enters the fidelity budget directly. We develop a functional-graph abstraction weighting each link by its predicted multiplicative contribution to end-to-end fidelity, separating global but delayed state from local and immediate state, and compare centralized against local allocation in a replicated discrete-event model. Centralized delivery latency grows with network diameter while local latency is nearly scale invariant, differing up to twenty-fold for short-range traffic; the coherence threshold at which a global view outweighs a fresh one does not shift across the tested sizes; and as heralding accelerates, the dominant cost moves into the control plane. Slot synchronization instead obeys the product of slot rate and one-way link delay, so it is bounded by repeater spacing rather than diameter. Controller placement, decision locality, repeater spacing and slot rate are physical design parameters, not implementation details.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I. Dey, N. Marchetti. 2026-09-19. Where to Decide: Control-Plane Geometry in Coherence-Limited Quantum Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23047
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.