arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.22486

Semantics Delivery Network: Rethinking Web Retrieval Infrastructure for LLM Agents

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly ground their answers in proprietary data and live web content through both single-shot retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and multi-turn agentic search. Yet the web path they use was built for human readers: search services return URLs and snippets ranked by generic relevance, and content delivery networks (CDNs) cache URL-addressed objects without knowing which passage an agent needs. LLMs instead consume short, semantically coherent passages - hereafter, chunks - selected for downstream utility rather than similarity alone, retrieve statefully across reasoning turns, and, as uncoordinated streams, repeatedly fetch, clean, chunk, and embed the same content. We argue that semantic chunk retrieval should become a first-class network-delivery abstraction, and propose the Semantics Delivery Network (SemDN): an origin-authorized, hierarchical substrate that indexes, searches, and caches web content at chunk granularity, serving clients and origins alike. SemDN is more than finer-grained caching: it must estimate missing or stale evidence without an explicit miss signal, let clients choose retrieval representations that origins need not see, and share state among clients with the same representation. Preliminary results show that page-first retrieval processes two to three orders of magnitude more content than agents consume, that agentic queries exhibit task-local chunk reuse invisible to URL caches, and that chunk delivery improves answer quality per context token. We organize an open research agenda around shareable retrieval state, hierarchical caching and refresh under coverage risk, and deployability, including incentives, privacy, and verifiability. Our code is available at: https://github.com/sarendis56/SemDN_HotNets26

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peichun Hua, Yunming Xiao. 2026-10-22. Semantics Delivery Network: Rethinking Web Retrieval Infrastructure for LLM Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22486

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Which Deep Learner? A Systematic Evaluation of Advanced Deep Forecasting Models Accuracy and Efficiency for Network Traffic Prediction

Network traffic prediction is an essential tool for automating modern network management. It is a difficult time series forecasting (TSF) problem that has been addressed by Deep Learning (DL) models due to their ability to capture complex patterns. Recent years have witnessed advances in deep forecasting models, from sophisticated transformer architectures to simple linear models, improving performance across diverse prediction tasks. However, given the diversity of these models, the variability of network traffic across environments and timescales, and the inherent challenges of network traffic prediction, it is essential to identify effective deployment choices and modeling directions. Henceforth, this study systematically identifies 12 deep forecasting models, comprising 8 advanced TSF models and 4 traditional deep learning architectures -- each with unique advantages for network traffic prediction -- against 3 statistical baselines, for a total of 15 forecasting methods and evaluate them on four real traffic datasets, across multiple time scales and horizons, assessing performance, robustness to anomalies, data gaps, external factors, data efficiency, and resource efficiency in terms of time, memory, and energy. Our results provide insights into model behaviour and guidelines for network management, highlighting performance regimes, efficiency thresholds, and promising architectures that balance accuracy, efficiency, and robustness to traffic challenges.

cs.NI↗

ORCHID: Fairness-Aware Orchestration in Mission-Critical Air-Ground Integrated Networks

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) provide on-demand wireless coverage for mission-critical Air-Ground Integrated Networks (AGINs). However, DRL-based orchestration faces challenges from multi-agent non-stationarity and the trade-off between energy efficiency (EE) and service fairness. To address these issues, we propose ORCHID (Orchestration of Resilient Coverage via Hybrid Intelligent Deployment), a stability-enhanced two-stage learning framework. First, GBS-aware topology partitioning provides a topology-informed warm start for UAV deployment. Second, a Reset-and-Finetune (R\&F) mechanism is integrated into Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) to support stable late-stage policy refinement through event-triggered rollback and learning-rate adaptation. To study the efficiency-fairness trade-off, ORCHID employs a Max-Min Fairness (MMF)-oriented bandwidth allocation based on a closed-form Egalitarian Bargaining Game (EBG) solution and is compared with Proportional Fairness (PF). Experiments show stronger served-user bottleneck-rate protection under MMF, together with competitive coverage and user-rate fairness and favorable energy-efficiency and UAV-load-balancing performance under zero-shot scalability and mobility tests. Overall, ORCHID provides an effective balance among user-level service protection, energy efficiency, and policy stability for resilient mission-critical UAV networks.

cs.NI↗

Halley: A Predictive Control Plane for Optical AI Data Center Networks

A frontier AI model is trained in an AI data center, on tens of thousands of accelerators joined by a dedicated network, and every training step ends with all of them exchanging data at once. Between racks, that network is optical, and each of its four layers, from lasers to switches, runs a fixed or after-the-fact policy. Lasers sharing an enclosure, cooling, and power can fail together. At a fixed spare ratio, correlated failure provably caps a pool's availability however large it grows. In this paper, we present a comprehensive predictive control plane framework, called Halley, that reads each resource's next state and acts before the failure occurs. It has four components, each carrying a formal guarantee: LightReserve that sizes the laser pool to provide a coverage bound, FoldFit that schedules the switch within $11/9$ of the optimal, ThermaLead that holds a microring with one-step-ahead control, and TriageGuard that protects the highest-risk modules first. Halley gives each layer a predictive controller that defers to the deployed policy when unsure. Composed from simulations at that point, effective goodput, the share of ideal throughput kept, rises from 65.2\% to 76.5\% if a window that exhausts its spares is lost. If only the dark channels' bandwidth is lost, it reaches 67.4\%. Per megawatt, that is up to 1.03--1.17 times the training; for the same training, up to 3.3--14.7\% less data center capacity. \textsf{Halley}'s fallback circuits are formally verified and are shown to achieve close timing on a commercial FPGA, and pass a 130~nm signoff.

cs.NI↗