AI-Assisted Assessment of Experimental Physics Laboratory Reports: Potential, Limitations, and Support for Teaching Practice

Marcos Abreu; Cecilia Stari; Arturo C. Marti

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.22417

AI-Assisted Assessment of Experimental Physics Laboratory Reports: Potential, Limitations, and Support for Teaching Practice

Marcos Abreu·Cecilia Stari·Arturo C. Marti

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The incorporation of AI into the assessment of physics laboratory reports offers opportunities to support the review of student work and the provision of feedback. This article revisits an experience involving the use of ChatGPT models to analyze laboratory reports and examines the conditions that influence their usefulness in teaching practice. The analysis considers the evolution of AI models, document-processing procedures, and different modes of interaction, with particular attention to the effective availability of evidence contained in student reports. The findings indicate that differences between AI-generated and teacher assessments may be related not only to model capabilities but also to difficulties in retrieving and interpreting equations, graphs, tables, units, and other visual elements. The possibilities of systematic processing of sets of reports and conversational review of cases requiring more focused analysis are also examined. Based on these observations, a working strategy is proposed in which AI serves as a complementary resource for organizing assessment, supporting feedback, and identifying recurring difficulties in student work. The analysis highlights the importance of document-processing conditions and evidence availability, as well as the teacher's role in interpreting AI-generated information and making evaluative and pedagogical decisions.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Marcos Abreu, Cecilia Stari, Arturo C. Marti. 2026-09-18. AI-Assisted Assessment of Experimental Physics Laboratory Reports: Potential, Limitations, and Support for Teaching Practice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22417

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community

Generative AI tools are being widely taken up by students in their physics courses and beyond, often before instructors and institutions can develop policies and effective approaches for the use of these tools. Building on a framework for change in the era of AI, we developed and implemented a faculty learning community to help a university physics department address these challenges collectively. Over six biweekly sessions, faculty worked through course policies, classroom conversations about AI, AI-integrated coursework tasks, and assessment. Each session shared a common structure: we presented local data and department-sourced materials, tested them in small groups, and discussed them together, emphasizing durable pedagogical approaches over specific tools and platforms, and leading with evidence of students' own AI use. The series produced a shared, evolving repository of resources for faculty to draw on. This workshop provides an adaptable, theoretically informed model for a faculty learning community that departments can build on.

physics.ed-ph↗