arXiv · 2609.21675
DRT: Dense Reasoning Trace for Efficient and Grounded Multimodal Reasoning
Abstract
Despite the remarkable progress in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), prevailing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigms remain confined to the natural-language expression space. Consequently, they inherently incur excessive linguistic overhead, leading to information dilution and weak visual grounding. To address this challenge, we propose Dense Reasoning Trace (DRT), a paradigm that departs from natural-language-centered CoT by expressing reasoning as compact structured traces, which include concise intermediate states with symbolic connectors and disentangle visual observations from logical deductions. First, we introduce the Dense Trace Initialization to internalize the DRT reasoning mode into the model, substantially improving token efficiency while preserving visual evidence. To further enable the model to faithfully capture the logical relations within traces, we propose the Trace-Grounded Reinforcement Learning framework, which builds reference traces through a tri-perspective verification pipeline and employs Trace-Grounded GRPO with structured rewards, encouraging the model to generate concise DRT-style traces with reduced hallucination and stronger logical grounding. Extensive experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks show that DRT achieves 5.5$\times$ token efficiency improvement while improving 1.3 accuracy points over the Qwen3-VL baseline. These findings suggest that complex multimodal reasoning may not require verbose natural-language traces, opening a more efficient path for next-generation MLLMs. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/HIT-leaderone/DRT
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Wan Xu, Yuanfan Guo, Kevin Han, LaLa Chen, Wangmeng Zuo. 2026-09-18. DRT: Dense Reasoning Trace for Efficient and Grounded Multimodal Reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21675
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.