Robust tests for log-normal lifetimes under cyclic-stress accelerated tests and interval monitoring

María Jaenada; Leandro Pardo; Kiran Prajapat

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.21434

Robust tests for log-normal lifetimes under cyclic-stress accelerated tests and interval monitoring

María Jaenada·Leandro Pardo·Kiran Prajapat

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Some products are, by nature, designed to operate under stress conditions that repeatedly cycle between two levels, such as batteries undergoing repeated charge and discharge, or components exposed to recurring thermal or pressure cycles. When such products are tested under accelerated conditions, the applied stress is naturally elevated in the same cyclic manner rather than held constant or increased in a single step. Cyclic-stress accelerated life testing (CyALT) reflects this by alternating the applied stress between specified levels. Units are often inspected only at fixed times, so the data consist of interval failure counts rather than exact lifetimes. Hypothesis testing plays a crucial role in this setting. It can assess whether the applied stress significantly affects lifetime, or validate the parameter values used to design the experiment. Classical tests rely on the maximum likelihood estimator, which is highly sensitive to contamination. Since interval probabilities are estimated jointly across stress conditions, a single anomalous failure count can distort the entire parameter vector and severely affect the test's significance level and power. This paper develops Wald-type and Rao-type test statistics for log-normal CyALT lifetimes under interval monitoring, based on the weighted minimum density power divergence estimator. Both tests are derived for simple and composite null hypotheses. A Monte Carlo study shows that classical tests lose control of the significance level rapidly under contamination, while the robust tests stay close to nominal with only a modest loss of power under clean data. An application to air-conditioner evaporator lifetime data further illustrates the proposed tests.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

María Jaenada, Leandro Pardo, Kiran Prajapat. 2026-09-18. Robust tests for log-normal lifetimes under cyclic-stress accelerated tests and interval monitoring. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21434

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗