arXiv · 2609.20829
SAGE: Schema-Guided LLMs for Grant Review
Abstract
Grant reviewers must apply detailed criteria to application forms, budgets, and supporting documents while producing assessments that colleagues can inspect. We present SAGE, Schema-Guided Aspect-Based Grant Evaluation, a system that translates a grant rubric into structured checks and links its judgements to evidence from the application package. We evaluate SAGE in two stages on 35 nonprofit grant applications. A post-factum comparison with 105 reviews from the original competition shows fair ordinal agreement (kappa = 0.29). The foundation then conducted a criterion-level re-review after inspecting SAGE, producing 202 assessments. In this assisted round, SAGE reached kappa = 0.58 and outperformed a one-prompt-per-criterion baseline (kappa = 0.33 on the common subset), with higher rank correlation and lower error. A claim-level audit further identifies confirmed, disputed, and unaddressed parts of the structured draft. SAGE operationalizes the review methodology by producing a detailed, evidence-linked, and auditable draft for expert correction.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Erik Varapaev, Andrei Chetvergov, Stepan Ukolov, Timofei Sivoraksha, Alexander Evseev, Sergey Bolovtsov. 2026-07-22. SAGE: Schema-Guided LLMs for Grant Review. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20829
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.