arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.20301

AgentPProf: Semantic Profiler for Long Horizon AI Agents

Abstract

AI agents increasingly orchestrate long-running activities with users, tools, and system resources for days and weeks. To improve agent quality, safety, and cost efficiency, developers need to determine where failures happen, what triggers unsafe effects, and which tasks consume the most budget, then optimize those tasks. In systems software, profiling answers similar questions by aggregating resource consumption and attributing it to responsible code paths to identify hotspots. Yet existing agent observability tools focus on per-execution debugging and tracing rather than cross-run, long term profiling, making these questions difficult to answer at scale. Agent observability needs profiling, not only debugging, but profiling agents is challenging: the responsible entities are task intent like diagnose authentication, compare branches rather than code paths, and lack stable identifiers for aggregation. We propose a semantic operation stack model that adapts profiling to agent trajectories. Uniform operations represent all activities, and operation stacks replace the runtime call stack, enabling hierarchical attribution at different granularities. We observe that an agent's task occupies a contiguous span and decomposes into subtasks, so we introduce recursive operation segmentation, which recursively splits trajectories at task boundaries. AgentPProf is a profiler that aggregates agent trajectories into pprof-compatible profiles, enabling flame graph visualization and analysis. AgentPProf reaches 0.764 $B^3$ F1 against human annotations on CodeTraceBench. On three problem-localization benchmarks, the profile raises MAP by up to 56%, demonstrating that it effectively attributes resources, locates problems, and helps optimize token cost at practical profiling cost. AgentPProf is available at https://github.com/eunomia-bpf/agentsight.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yusheng Zheng, Chaokun Chang, Yu Mao, Tianyuan Wu, Yuxi Huang, Tao Ma, Wenan Mao, Shuyi Cheng, Andi Quinn, Wei Wang. 2026-09-14. AgentPProf: Semantic Profiler for Long Horizon AI Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20301

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Memory-Free Continual Learning with Null Space Adaptation for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Models

Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization, enabling deployment in a wide range of real-world tasks without additional task-specific training. However, in real deployment scenarios with evolving environments or emerging classes, these models inevitably face distributional shifts and novel tasks. In such contexts, static zero-shot capabilities are insufficient, and there is a growing need for continual learning methods that allow models to adapt over time while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. We introduce NuSA-CL (Null Space Adaptation for Continual Learning), a lightweight memory-free continual learning framework designed to address this challenge. NuSA-CL employs low-rank adaptation and constrains task-specific weight updates to lie within an approximate null space of the model's current parameters. This strategy minimizes interference with previously acquired knowledge, effectively preserving the zero-shot capabilities of the original model. Unlike methods relying on replay buffers or costly distillation, NuSA-CL imposes minimal computational and memory overhead, making it practical for deployment in resource-constrained, real-world continual learning environments. Experiments show that our framework not only effectively preserves zero-shot transfer capabilities but also achieves highly competitive performance on continual learning benchmarks. These results position NuSA-CL as a practical and scalable solution for continually evolving zero-shot VLMs in real-world applications.

cs.AI

VeRA: Renewing Reasoning Benchmarks with Executable Specifications

Reasoning benchmarks need renewal along two axes: freshness and headroom. VeRA makes both executable and auditable by turning each item into a task family: a natural-language template, an input generator, and a deterministic answer program. VeRA-E draws fresh instances within a family; VeRA-H modifies the family toward harder tasks; and VeRA-H Pro selects one judge-ranked candidate from up to five validated proposals per seed. Execution checks, seed anchoring, answer discrimination, and independent human solving validate specifications and items. Accepted programs generate further labeled instances through local computation. Across 16 models, AIME-2024 accuracy decreases from 84.46% on seeds to 70.25% on VeRA-E variants, exposing a gap between fixed-item success and fresh-instance robustness. On AIME-2024-II, the human-audited VeRA-H Pro release lowers accuracy from 84.91% to 58.57%. Across the three hardening sources, H Pro has lower mean accuracy than H. On AMO-Bench, both releases average higher accuracy than the seeds under the evaluated budget. Initial auditing accepts 75.4% of hardened candidates; targeted repair raises usable yield to 95.1%. Executable families thus support repeatable benchmark renewal, with validation improving task quality and selection shaping the delivered challenge.

cs.AI

When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies

AIs are increasingly being deployed with greater autonomy and capabilities, which increases the risk that a misaligned AI may be able to cause catastrophic harm. Untrusted monitoring -- using one untrusted model to oversee another -- is one approach to reducing risk. Justifying the safety of an untrusted monitoring deployment is challenging because developers cannot safely deploy a misaligned model to test their protocol directly. In this paper, we develop upon existing methods for rigorously demonstrating safety based on pre-deployment testing. We relax assumptions that previous AI control research made about the collusion strategies a misaligned AI might use to subvert untrusted monitoring. We develop a taxonomy covering passive self-recognition, causal collusion (hiding pre-shared signals), acausal collusion (hiding signals via Schelling points), and combined strategies. We create a safety case sketch to clearly present our argument, explicitly state our assumptions, and highlight unsolved challenges. We identify conditions under which passive self-recognition could be a more effective collusion strategy than those studied previously. Our work builds towards more robust evaluations of untrusted monitoring.

cs.AI