arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.20283

Queries Knew More Than We Thought: Uncovering Latent Knowledge in Segmentation Models

Abstract

Modern segmenters often fail after the expensive computation has already been done: a useful mask is present among the model's query-conditioned candidates, but the deployed selection rule does not expose it. We study this output-selection bottleneck in frozen DETR-family models. A ground-truth-only oracle first shows substantial hidden headroom in already-computed mask proposals. This raises a simple question: How can we better use the masks a segmenter has already computed but does not expose? We then ask whether that headroom can be recovered without adding queries, generating new masks, rerunning the backbone, or updating weights. HYDRA is a small selector trained only on cached frozen outputs. At inference time, it scores the cached candidates against an explicit keep-baseline option and acts only when a held-out calibrated margin indicates the selected candidate is sufficiently better. Trained on training-split caches and calibrated on held-out data, HYDRA improves Mask2Former, MaskDINO, and OneFormer by up to +7.41 dataset mIoU points on ADE20k and COCO, and improves SAM 3 by +9.4 class-macro prompt-IoU points on average across eight domains while preserving useful predictions through calibration. Paired LoRA controls show that lightweight weight adaptation does not remove the bottleneck: exposed predictions are often flat or worse, while routing over the adapted candidates still recovers accuracy. Finally, we connect the effect to query specialization under bipartite matching and verify it in a controlled TinyDETR study. These results show that frozen segmenters should be evaluated not only by the masks they expose, but also by the useful candidates they suppress.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ignacio M. De la Jara, Cristian Rodriguez-Opazo, Damith Ranasinghe. 2026-07-30. Queries Knew More Than We Thought: Uncovering Latent Knowledge in Segmentation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV