arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.19655

Maximum and Minimum Spectral Radii in an Exceptional Family for Edge-Disjoint Spanning Trees

Abstract

For a connected graph $G$, let $τ(G)$ denote the maximum number of pairwise edge-disjoint spanning trees, and let $ρ(G)$ be its adjacency spectral radius. For integers $n\ge1$, $k\ge2$, and $k\leδ\le2k-1$, let $\mathcal{G}_{n,δ}$ be the class of connected $n$-vertex graphs with minimum degree $δ$, and let $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{H}}^{2}(n,k,δ)\subseteq\mathcal{G}_{n,δ}$ be the exceptional family introduced by Chang, Li, and Zhang. For sufficiently large $n$, the sharp adjacency-spectral threshold for $τ(G)\ge k$ is determined by maximizing $ρ(G)$ over this family. Set $h=δ-k$. For each fixed admissible pair $(k,δ)$ and all sufficiently large $n$, we determine the maximum and minimum adjacency spectral radii in $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{H}}^{2}(n,k,δ)$. In the core--placement representation, let $M$ be the missing-edge graph of the bounded core. For $h\ge2$, the unique maximizer, up to isomorphism, satisfies $M\cong K_{1,h}\cup(h+1)K_1$, with the exceptional edges nested on the large-clique side. Hence the matching configuration proposed in Conjecture~2 of Chang--Li--Zhang is not extremal. For every $h\ge1$, the unique minimizer satisfies $M\cong hK_2\cup2K_1$, with the $2h$ exceptional edges having distinct endpoints on the large-clique side. We also settle the cases $h=0,1$ and all equality cases. The proof combines an exact core--placement parametrization with a uniform Schur-complement resolvent expansion. The first candidate-dependent coefficient is affine in $\sum_{x\in V(M)}d_M(x)^2$, while the first placement-sensitive coefficient is a squared-load functional. Equitable quotient matrices yield the two extremal radii, and the maximizing graph gives the sharp global adjacency-spectral threshold.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xuanyu Cao, Chunxiang Wang. 2026-09-17. Maximum and Minimum Spectral Radii in an Exceptional Family for Edge-Disjoint Spanning Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO