arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.16672

Lesion-centered 3D mapping of colonoscopy procedures: validation of a hierarchical ensemble pipeline on public benchmark videos

Hyunjun Kim·Hyeonwoo Na·Jaewoo Lee
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background and Objective: Colonoscopy recording practice preserves text reports and still photographs, while the spatial information already present in the recorded video - where the scope traveled, where a lesion was observed, and whether the same lesion was seen again - is discarded when the procedure ends. This study determines whether a lesion-centered spatial record can be assembled and validated without full-colon 3D reconstruction. Methods: A four-layer hierarchical pipeline was assembled - (1) a global topological map, (2) lesion-level spatio-temporal tracks, (3) on-demand local 3D reconstruction, and (4) persistent lesion identity across repeated observations - and ran end to end on four public videos (two C3VDv2 sequences with ground-truth depth and two full REAL-Colon procedures; 40,245 frames). All components are published, individually validated methods; the contribution is their lesion-centered assembly, linking rules, and evaluation. Results: Revisits, impossible under forward-only mapping by construction, were detected by entry-map Bayesian localization: 5,614 and 4,043 revisit events (56 and 68 distinct nodes) in the two full procedures. Lesion-identity merging at the adopted threshold 0.5 maintained ground-truth purity 1.0 while auto-merging 20 of 231 candidate pairs. The endoscopy-specific geometry engine outperformed a general-purpose foundation model on all metrics (overall absolute relative error (AbsRel) 0.2276 vs. 0.3523). Conclusions: The results are partial but establish a concrete near-term path: revisit detection, lesion identity, and local 3D each returned quantitative, reproducible output without waiting for complete geometric reconstruction; validating the record on clinical data is the next step.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hyunjun Kim, Hyeonwoo Na, Jaewoo Lee. 2026-09-15. Lesion-centered 3D mapping of colonoscopy procedures: validation of a hierarchical ensemble pipeline on public benchmark videos. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16672

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗