arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.16243

Does a Higher Frame Rate Improve the Measurement of g? Precision and Accuracy in Video Analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of frame rate, expressed in frames per second (FPS), on the experimental estimation of the acceleration due to gravity, g, using video analysis with Tracker. Two different dynamical systems were analysed: free fall and a simple pendulum. Starting from original recordings acquired at 120 FPS, equivalent 60, 30, and 10 FPS series were generated by uniform temporal decimation, preserving the same physical trajectory within each realisation. The analysis included ten independent realisations for free fall and eight for the pendulum. For each condition, the mean estimate of g, the standard deviation across realisations, the relative error with respect to g_ref = 9.81 m s^-2, and the RMSE were calculated. For free fall, the 120 FPS condition exhibited the lowest dispersion and RMSE, whereas the mean estimates obtained at 10 and 30 FPS were closer to the reference value. For the simple pendulum, by contrast, the mean value of g, dispersion, relative error, and RMSE remained essentially unchanged between 10 and 120 FPS. An additional analysis of the 12 possible subsampling phases at 10 FPS showed that this stability does not critically depend on a particular choice of decimation phase and that the variability associated with phase is small compared with the dispersion observed across realisations. The results show that a higher temporal sampling rate does not necessarily provide both greater precision and closer agreement with the reference value. The influence of FPS depends on the temporal characteristics of the system and on the procedure used to estimate the physical parameter. In particular, a higher temporal sampling density may reduce dispersion or increase robustness to sampling without necessarily yielding an estimate closer to the expected value.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mauricio Echiburu Fuenzalida, Nicolás Fernández Astudillo. 2026-09-14. Does a Higher Frame Rate Improve the Measurement of g? Precision and Accuracy in Video Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Force Concept Inventory Across Continents: Testing Q-Matrix Transferability and Cross-Cultural Differences in Mechanics Reasoning

The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) is one of the most widely used research-based assessments in physics education, yet the assumption that its underlying cognitive structure is transferable across educational contexts remains largely untested. This study investigates the transferability of FCI Q-matrices using the Generalized Deterministic Inputs, Noisy "And" Gate (G-DINA) cognitive diagnostic applied to two large cohorts: students from the Learning About STEM Student Outcomes (LASSO) online system database in the United States (N = 4,750) and introductory physics students at the University of Johannesburg, South Africa (N = 1,016). Rather than treating the analysis as a local model calibration exercise, we frame the problem as one of cross-context cognitive invariance. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analyses revealed substantial cross-cultural differences, with 14 of 30 items exhibiting high DIF after controlling for latent skill mastery. These differences were concentrated in force dynamics and contact-force reasoning and remained invariant under alternative Q-matrix specifications. The findings suggest that observed differences reflect genuine variations in students' conceptual reasoning rather than psychometric artifacts, highlighting the importance of validating Q-matrix structures before deploying cognitive diagnostic and adaptive assessments across diverse non-local educational settings.

physics.ed-ph

Inference uncertainty about an aircraft crash

Problem-based learning benefits from situations taken from real life, which usually stimulate student interest. In this paper, we examine the shooting down of the Rwandan president's aircraft on April 6th, 1994. We discuss methods to infer information about the location from which the missile was launched, its trajectory and type, where the aircraft was struck and its trajectory during the fall. To this end, we developed a physics-based analysis based on expert reports, witness statements, and other publicly available information, as interpreted by our calculations. The analysis is designed to be understandable using undergraduate-level physics. The uncertainty of each result is discussed and propagated to ensure a proper assessment of the hypotheses and a traceability of their consequences. Such approach encourages the students to exercise their critical mind and teaches inference methods that are routinely used in physics research. In addition, it illustrates the importance and limits of scientific expertise during a judiciary process.

physics.ed-ph

Skepticism vs. Convenience: Physics Students' Perceptions and Use of Large Language Models Before and After Instruction

The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) has produced research focusing on the ability of these tools to solve physics problems, evaluate student work, or otherwise impact the problem-solving process of students. However, studies exploring how physics students perceive LLMs (in terms of capabilities, educational impacts, usage, and role in problem solving) remain limited. This study evaluates the first-year physics students' perceptions toward LLMs and further explores how these perceptions change after practicing problem-solving with and without LLMs and engaging in a reflective lesson on the functioning and educational impacts of LLMs. We find that student opinions toward LLMs vary, with generally favorable perceptions of their capabilities but greater skepticism regarding their value for learning. Despite this skepticism, a majority of students self-report regularly using LLMs to obtain help, commonly reporting deadlines and convenience as motivating factors. Following the lesson, students expressed greater skepticism toward LLMs in several areas, with 88% of students believing that LLMs can leave them with a false sense of confidence about their understanding, up from 58% before the lesson.

physics.ed-ph