arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.15414

Large Complete Minors from a Cheeger Condition

Abstract

Let $G$ be a graph on $n$ vertices, and let $e_G(S,V(G)\setminus S)$ be the number of edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$. The Cheeger constant and the restricted Cheeger constant of $G$, where $k\ge1$ is real, are, respectively, \[ h(G)=\min_{\substack{\emptyset\ne S\subseteq V(G)\\|S|\le \frac{n}{2}}} \frac{e_G(S,V(G)\setminus S)}{|S|} \text{ and } h_k(G)=\min_{\substack{\emptyset\ne S\subseteq V(G) |S|\le\min\{k,\frac{n}{2}\}}} \frac{e_G(S,V(G)\setminus S)}{|S|}. \] The contraction clique number $\ccl(G)$ is the largest integer $r$ such that $G$ contains the complete graph $K_r$ as a minor. Krivelevich and Nenadov [Complete minors in graphs without sparse cuts, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 12 (2021) 8996--9015] proved that, for every fixed $\eps>0$ and all sufficiently large $n$ and $d$, if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices with maximum degree at most $d$, then $h(G)\ge\eps d$ and $h_{\eps n}(G)\ge(\frac{1}{2}+\eps)d$ imply $\ccl(G)=Ω_\eps(\sqrt{\frac{nd}{\log d}})$. They asked to determine if one can guarantee the same lower bound on $\ccl(G)$ without the additional condition on $h_{\eps n}(G)$. They showed that this is the case when $d$ is a constant. We answer this question affirmatively. For every $\eps>0$, there are constants $β=β(\eps)>0$ and $n_0=n_0(\eps)$ such that, whenever $d\ge 3$ is an integer, for every graph $G$ with $n\ge n_0$ vertices and maximum degree at most $d$, if $h(G)\ge\eps d$, then $\ccl(G)\geβ\sqrt{\frac{nd}{\log d}}$. The dependence of this lower bound on $n$ and $d$ is best possible up to a constant factor. As a corollary, a lower bound is derived for the contraction clique number of $d$-regular graphs for which the second largest eigenvalue is bounded away from $d$, compared to earlier $\frac{d}{2}$. The proof combines spectral properties of graphs with an analysis of lazy random walks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chengli Li, Leyou Xu, Bo Zhou. 2026-09-14. Large Complete Minors from a Cheeger Condition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15414

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO