arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.14590

Reverse Spatio-Temporal Disease Progression Modelling

Abstract

Deep learning-based spatio-temporal disease progression models commonly overlook the incubation period of progressive diseases, limiting the use of those models in early interventions, which are vital for not easily reversible diseases such as Alzheimer's. This is because, the existing deep learning based longitudinal disease-progression models are almost always run forward: from an observed baseline they predict future decline. In many clinical settings, however, imaging begins only after pathology is suspected or already visible, the earlier, healthier patient-specific reference was never acquired. To address this, we propose to study reverse disease progression prediction: given later diseased anatomy, reconstruct the unobserved healthier anatomy that preceded it. We use a two-stage model in which a frozen 3D vector-quantised autoencoder defines a compact discrete latent space, while a Neural Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) learns continuous-time dynamics in that space. A recurrent encoder reads late observations in reverse temporal order, initialises the latent state, and the ODE is integrated backwards across the trajectory. On a controlled Morpho-MNIST benchmark with a sinusoidal perturbation, our model successfully recovered the unseen previous states from later observations of the non-monotonic trajectory. On longitudinal brain MRIs from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, at the task to recover the previous unseen trajectory towards healthy states of the patients from observed later diseased states, our model outperforms the baselines that uses copy-nearest and mean-observed, with positive disease-reversal scores in every diagnostic stratum. We hope that our work can provide insights and tools towards discovering the incubation periods from single-shot scans, and developing early interventions of diseases based on imaging.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ulugbek Shernazarov, Moucheng Xu, Inomjon Ramatov. 2026-09-13. Reverse Spatio-Temporal Disease Progression Modelling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14590

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV