Abundance Is an Expenditure Condition: AI Automation, Scarcity Rents, and Access

Abstract

If AI and automation make reproducible goods cheap, do scarcity rents disappear or migrate? We give a closed general-equilibrium answer that separates a low unit price from economic abundance. Agents consume an automated good, a fixed-supply good, and a numeraire; their purchasing power comes from resource endowments and ownership of scarce assets. The equilibrium of a heterogeneous economy exists, is unique, and is globally stable. Aggregate scarcity rent obeys an exact accounting identity: it rises with automation if and only if real expenditure on the automated good falls. In a symmetric economy this sign is determined by whether the curvature of marginal utility is above or below one. Thus marginal cost converging to zero is insufficient: demand rebound can absorb the released resources. After automated demand is fixed or sufficiently satiated, each agent's access share is an exact convex combination of net purchasing-power and scarce-asset ownership shares. This yields a concentration decomposition with a covariance term, showing why equalizing one asset can increase access inequality when ownership sources were offsetting. A compute extension distinguishes a fixed productive input, whose rent can vanish, from a binding throughput constraint, whose rent persists. Numerical experiments reproduce the sign reversals, ownership effects, and institutional frontiers, and imply eight falsifiable restrictions. The results replace a binary ``post-scarcity'' claim with a testable condition on expenditure, capacity, and ownership.