arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.12673

A maximum matching based refinement of Brouwers conjecture

Abstract

Let $G$ be a simple graph on $n$ vertices and $e(G)$ edges. Let $μ_1\geq \cdots \geq μ_{n-1}\geq μ_n=0$ be the Laplacian eigenvalues of $G$. For $k=1, \ldots, n$, let $S_k(G)=\sum_{i=1}^{k}μ_i$. Brouwers conjecture asserts that for any $k\in\{1,\ldots, n\}$, $S_k(G)\leq e(G)+\binom{k+1}{2}$. In [Bounding the sum of the largest Laplacian eigenvalues of graphs, {\em Discrete Appl. Math.}, 170:95--103, (2014)], Rocha and Trevisan showed that the conjecture holds true for $1 \leq k \leq \lfloor g/5 \rfloor$, where $g$ denotes the girth of $G$. This bound on $k$ was later improved by Chen in [Improved results on Brouwers conjecture for sum of the Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph, {\em Linear Algebra Appl.}, 557:327--338, (2018)], who established that the conjecture holds for $1 \leq k \leq \lfloor g/4 \rfloor$. In this article, we further strengthen these results by proving that the Brouwers conjecture holds for $1\leq k\leq\left\lfloor \frac{m(G)}{2}\right\rfloor,$ where $m(G)$ denotes the matching number of $G$. Since $m(G)\geq \lfloor g/2\rfloor$, the case constitutes a genuine improvement over the aforementioned results. As an application, we show that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ and with a perfect matching, then the Brouwers conjecture holds for $1\leq k\leq \left\lfloor \frac{n}{4}\right\rfloor$. Finally, we provide a new perspective on verifying Brouwers conjecture by proving that $G$ satisfies the Brouwers conjecture if and only if for a fixed positive integer $h$, $\mathcal{S}_h(\overline{G})\leq e(\overline{G})+\binom{h+1}{2}$ holds whenever $\mathcal{S}_h(G)\leq e(G)+\binom{h+1}{2}$, where $\overline{G}$ denotes the complement of $G$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tahir Shamsher. 2026-09-11. A maximum matching based refinement of Brouwers conjecture. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12673

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO