School Choice Problems with Priority Adjustments

Minoru Kitahara; Yasunori Okumura

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.12558

School Choice Problems with Priority Adjustments

Minoru Kitahara·Yasunori Okumura

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper studies school choice when each school has an original priority order and an adjusted priority order reflecting policies such as affirmative action. We introduce a weak notion of stability that permits justified envy under one priority order only when the opposite priority relation is supported by the other. We characterize weakly stable matchings as stable matchings under the intersection of the two priority profiles. Using the efficiency-adjusted deferred acceptance algorithm, we obtain a weakly stable matching that cannot be Pareto improved upon, within the set of weakly stable matchings, for any group containing all improved students by the adjustment. We also show that any Pareto improvement over this outcome necessarily creates justified envy under both priority profiles. Finally, our mechanism is responsive to stronger priority adjustments: the outcome under a stronger affirmative action policy is not Pareto dominated by that under a weaker policy for any group containing all students improved by the stronger adjustment.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Minoru Kitahara, Yasunori Okumura. 2026-09-11. School Choice Problems with Priority Adjustments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12558

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Rationally Inattentive Echo Chambers

Rationally inattentive players allocate limited attention capacities to biased primary sources and to other players as secondary sources to acquire information about an uncertain state. The resulting Poisson attention network stochastically transmits information from primary sources to a recipient either directly or indirectly through other players. We give conditions for the rise of echo-chamber equilibria in which players restrict attention to their own-biased primary source and same-type peers. We characterize the peer attention networks within echo chambers and analyze their comparative statics. Our results explain why modern information environments foster echo-chamber formation, how small differences in attention capacities can magnify into large disparities in allocations, and why regulatory interventions such as altering user visibility on social media or mandating exposure to opposing views may entail unintended consequences.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Trading Frictions in Dynamic Cap-and-Trade Markets

Using 2.8 million EU ETS transactions and compliance records, 2005-2022, we document three facts about the world's largest carbon market: each year, 37% of regulated operators do not trade, and non-trading is persistent. Purchases concentrate in the April surrender month, when returns are systematically high. Operator order flow predicts returns, concentrated among frequent traders. A model with costly market access, limited intermediation, and heterogeneous information rationalizes all three. Because access is endogenous, the frictions interact non-additively, shaping how efficiently the market corrects the externality. Staggering deadlines across four groups lowers the surrender-month premium by 58% without changing the cap.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Effort without Evidence

I study how paternalistic concern for descendants' success affects learning about the need for costly effort. Each generation can use a demanding method or experiment with a less demanding alternative whose effectiveness is uncertain. Parents who underweight descendants' effort costs undervalue the savings that discovery would provide. On an explicit region of priors and preferences, paternalism removes a materially valuable experiment even though the relevant private record is truthfully transmitted. Relative to an aligned equilibrium attaining the material full-record optimum, the paternalistic equilibrium has greater long-run effort and observed success, lower discounted material welfare, and a less informative terminal public signal. Each sender obtains its preferred full-record continuation, so the comparison survives communication deviations within the same physical environment. I also study concealment as an incentive to experiment. A continuous-effort extension establishes that concealment and finite evidence production can coexist in an infinite-horizon equilibrium. Its welfare gain over babbling is distinct from the loss relative to alignment in the main result.

econ.TH↗