arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.11981

Maximizing the magnitude of Strictly Standardized Mean Difference of a Linear Combination

Abstract

The strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD) is an interpretable, unit-free effect size originally developed for quality control and hit selection in high-throughput screening and subsequently extended to effect-size assessment and error-rate control. Existing SSMD theory considers one variable at a time. Here, we extend SSMD to a linear combination of multiple variables and determine the coefficients that maximize the resulting SSMD. We show that this optimization can be formulated as a generalized Rayleigh quotient with a closed-form solution and identify conditions under which the optimal direction coincides with Fisher's linear discriminant. We derive method-of-moments, bias-corrected, and maximum-likelihood estimators of the maximized SSMD and construct confidence intervals based on Hotelling's T-squared statistic and the noncentral F distribution under different correlation and variance structures. We also characterize classification cutoffs for the resulting linear score and establish its relationship with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Simulations show that SSMD maximization coincides with Fisher's linear discriminant and logistic regression under equal covariance but diverges under unequal covariance and class imbalance. In paired designs, SSMD maximization uniquely incorporates cross-covariance information. Linear support vector machines are also evaluated as a modern comparator. This framework provides an interpretable approach to constructing multivariable biomarkers and signatures for high-throughput screening, cytokine profiling, metabolomics, salivary diagnostics, and continuous-monitoring applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaohua Douglas Zhang. 2026-09-06. Maximizing the magnitude of Strictly Standardized Mean Difference of a Linear Combination. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11981

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach

Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches estimate causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated and assumes parallel trends in outcome means. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed to compare means; however, transformations may be difficult to choose and results may be sensitive to the choice and must be interpreted on the transformed scale. Recent DID methods estimate alternative treatment effects that offer additional insights. However, each estimator requires a different parallel trends assumption. We introduce a new DID method that estimates average, quantile, probability, and novel Mann-Whitney treatment effects among the treated with a single unifying parallel trends assumption. The method uses a semi-parametric cumulative probability model (CPM): a linear model for a latent variable on covariates, where the latent variable results from an unspecified transformation of the outcome. Our approach makes a single parallel trends assumption on the expectation of the latent variable conditional on covariates. Hence, we avoid specifying outcome transformations and separate estimand-specific assumptions. We introduce the method; describe identification, estimation, and inference; conduct simulations evaluating its performance; and apply it to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on CD4 count among people with HIV.

stat.ME↗

A Stable Lasso

The Lasso has been widely used as a method for variable selection, valued for its simplicity and empirical performance. However, Lasso's selection stability deteriorates in the presence of correlated predictors. Several approaches have been developed to mitigate this limitation. In this paper, we provide a brief review of existing approaches, highlighting their limitations. We then propose a technique to improve the selection stability of Lasso by integrating a weighting scheme into the Lasso penalty function, where the weights are defined as an increasing function of a correlation-adjusted ranking that reflects the predictive power of predictors. Empirical evaluations on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method. Additional numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in stabilizing other regularization-based selection methods, indicating its potential as a general-purpose solution.

stat.ME↗

Copula-Based Time Series for Non-Gaussian and Non-Markovian Stationary Processes

In the copula-based approach to univariate time series modeling, the finite-dimensional temporal dependence of a stationary time series is captured by a copula. Recent studies investigate how copula-based time series models can be generalized to have long-term autoregressive effects. We study a generalization that comes from a Markov sequence of order p and a q-dependent sequence. We derive the relation of the model to Gaussian-ARMA models and to the Gaussian-GARCH(1,1) model. We investigate distributional properties of the process and discuss the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Additionally we analyze the copula moving aggregate process of order one, or MAG(1), as it is a basic building block. Last, we assess the model in a probabilistic forecasting study on a data series for German wind power production.

stat.ME↗