arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.09685

ALIGN-HOLD: Experience Alignment for Real-Time Hold Control in Large-Scale Ride-Hailing Matching at DiDi

Zuhao Zhang·Xu Liu·Kai Wan·Zihao Lu·Li Ma·Shuai Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Real-time hold control is a high-leverage mechanism in large-scale ride-hailing systems: by selectively deferring driver-order pairs, the platform can wait for better matching opportunities and improve end-to-end passenger-driver experience. Existing production systems such as EXHOLD learn bandit-based hold policies from handcrafted combinations of trip completion, cancellations, waiting time, and driver effort. However, designing such rewards becomes increasingly difficult as marketplace preferences are heterogeneous and observed passenger-driver behavior can be sparse, noisy, and affected by dynamic supply-demand conditions. We present ALIGN-HOLD, a production-scale experience alignment framework that learns hold policy from implicit marketplace preferences. ALIGN-HOLD constructs complementary preference pairs from order trajectories, driver trajectories, and contemporaneous local matching graphs, and trains an experience Reward Model (RM) using balanced multi-view sampling and model-adaptive hard preference sampling. During simulator-based policy learning, the frozen RM provides a dense, context-dependent reward and supports label-free filtering of low-identifiability interactions whose behavioral feedback is difficult to attribute to matching quality. We deploy ALIGN-HOLD on DiDi's ride-hailing platform and evaluate it in a 28-day randomized A/B experiment, covering approximately 100,000 passenger requests per day. Compared with the deployed production policy, ALIGN-HOLD achieves statistically significant improvements in trip completion rate and driver income, while significantly reducing passenger cancellations before and after driver acceptance. Complementary ablations, RM diagnostics, and behavioral analyses validate the contributions of the proposed components. ALIGN-HOLD has been fully ramped up and is currently serving DiDi's Brazil marketplace.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zuhao Zhang, Xu Liu, Kai Wan, Zihao Lu, Li Ma, Shuai Li. 2026-09-09. ALIGN-HOLD: Experience Alignment for Real-Time Hold Control in Large-Scale Ride-Hailing Matching at DiDi. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09685

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗