arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.09529

Frobenius Galois expansions of substructural logics:Algebraization, Kalman equivalence and positive cone semantics

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to introduce a Frobenius--Galois expansion of the substructural logic $\mathbf{FL}_{ew}$ and develop its algebraic and categorical semantics. The resulting logic, denoted by $\mathbf{FL}^{\mathbf{FGC}}_{ew}$, is obtained by adjoining a pair of unary connectives forming a Galois connection and satisfying suitable Frobenius-type compatibility conditions. Firstly, we prove that $\mathbf{FL}^{\mathbf{FGC}}_{ew}$ is algebraizable in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi and identify its equivalent algebraic semantics with the variety of Frobenius-adjoint residuated lattices, establishing the conservativity over $\mathbf{FL}_{ew}$ and relating its finite model property to residual finiteness of finitely generated free algebras. Secondly, for the distributive setting, we lift the Kalman construction to the Frobenius-adjoint algebraic framework. More precisely, we establish a categorical equivalence between Frobenius-adjoint residuated distributive lattices and Frobenius-adjoint $c$-differential residuated distributive lattices with the condition $\mathbf{CK}$. This equivalence yields a positive-cone representation of the former structures and, in turn, a logical counterpart of the categorical correspondence. Finally, for the distributive extension $\mathbf{FL}^{\mathbf{FGC},d}_{ew}$, we prove that derivability, validity over Frobenius-adjoint residuated distributive lattices, and validity over the corresponding positive cones determine the same consequence relation, and further show that this correspondence preserves equational and quasi-equational consequence, conservativity, and finite countermodels. These results provide a unified algebraic, categorical, and logical framework for Frobenius--Galois expansions of substructural logics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juntao Wang, jieqiong Shi, Mei Wang. 2026-09-08. Frobenius Galois expansions of substructural logics:Algebraization, Kalman equivalence and positive cone semantics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09529

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO