arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.05186

An Empirical Study on Learning Paths and Gender Dynamics in Scrum Master Roles

Manuela Petrescu·Paul Razvan Petrescu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Context: Agile development methodology has been widely adopted by industry and the demand for experienced professionals in Agile-related roles is persistently high. Objectives: We focus on the learning path for a Scrum Master role in multicultural software companies and investigate the role in relation to team size, together with the learning process for a career path, and how companies monitor soft skills development. Method: We conducted our study in two phases, two qualitative surveys (interview studies) and performed a qualitative and quantitative data analysis of the results. Conclusions: Our results identified that the need for a Scrum Master (SM) depends on the size of the team, with our study indicating a six-member limit. There is no overall standardized process for soft skills learning or metrics to measure progress. Some companies measure soft skills based on feedback received from the client or from the team, and other companies are taking both types of feedback into consideration. Many learning initiatives, especially on soft skills for an SM role, were based on actions of the employees. The version of Record of this contribution is published in Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. SEAA 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 16083. Springer, Cham. and available online at: check DOI.

Explore related subjects

cs.SEcs.CY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Manuela Petrescu, Paul Razvan Petrescu. 2026-09-04. An Empirical Study on Learning Paths and Gender Dynamics in Scrum Master Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04207-1_1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CY subjectcs.SE subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

ParaStudent: Closing the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulators for AI Tutor Evaluation

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence (AI) tutor feedback before deployment requires anticipating student engagement, typically assessed through real interaction data. We introduce ParaStudent, a fine-tuning framework for simulating novice programming revisions to support AI tutor evaluation. Compared with prompted baselines, ParaStudent's revisions more closely match real student code distributions across functional, stylistic, and semantic metrics. Our best variant achieves AUCs of 0.80 for both feedback relevance and successful uptake when distinguishing streams with real engagement above versus at or below the median, while prompted baselines remain near chance on successful uptake. These findings demonstrate the promise of simulated engagement for pre-deployment feedback triage.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

FlavourBench: Executable Culinary Reward Maps for Language Model Evaluation and Post-Training

We introduce FlavorBench: a benchmark for Compiling Dense Deterministic Answer Maps from a Versioned Culinary Embeddings Model. We test 27 frontier large language model endpoints on 534 substitution, pairing and constraining tasks for tasks that request a 3-ingredient portfolio from 8 candidates and score all 56 resulting portfolios. We conducted multiplicity-controlled paired tests on 101 of 351 model contrasts for this task-set. The largest point estimate on this task-set was achieved by Grok 4.6 at 65.1. The same rankings for this task-set were also achieved on several independently-compiled panels (using a variety of familiar metrics, task filters, etc.) and 3 public Epicure checkpoints. We present a 3-seed post-training study where LoRA SFT of a Qwen3-0.6B checkpoint on 270 optimal answers for Epicure to score on this task-set resulted in a 13.3 point gain on 84 anchor-disjoint maps (compared to format and label-matched control; 95% CI: 6.52, 20.29; p = 0.000170).

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Building a research-software catalog with a coding agent: from hackathon prototype to public deployment

Generative AI and coding agents can accelerate research software development, but they also increase the need for efficient software discovery and maintenance. We developed a repository catalog during a three-day hackathon and subsequently examined the engineering required to make it suitable for public deployment, including adversarial review, data-quality checks, browser-level validation, and publication safeguards. We then explored whether the lessons learned from this prototype could be transferred to a much larger, human-curated portal, through a retrieval agent under development for MateriApps that combines curated portal metadata, external documentation, vector search, and local language-model generation. Implementation with coding agents was rapid, but achieving reliable operation required substantial additional engineering: the most consequential problems were not crashes but silent failures that produced plausible yet incomplete or incorrect outputs, arising from incomplete data acquisition, misleading assessments, and retrieval or preprocessing failures. These observations suggest that AI-assisted software portals require explicit validation, monitoring, and repeated review, and that curated metadata and maintained documentation remain essential. The MateriApps work is exploratory and remains under active development, so the observations reported for it are preliminary; a comparable combination of curated metadata, automatically collected documentation, and retrieval-based assistance may nevertheless be useful for extending other research-software portals.

cs.SE↗