arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.04414

An iterative rounding $2$-approximation for Feedback Vertex Set via AI-assisted proof of an extreme point property

Abstract

We consider the Feedback Vertex Set problem (FVS): the input is an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and the goal is to find a minimum-cardinality (or a min-cost in the weighted case) subset $S \subseteq V$ of vertices such that $G-S$ has no cycles. A $2$-approximation via the local-ratio method was developed in the mid 90's by Bafna, Berman and Fujito (1995) and by Becker and Geiger (1996), and this approximation ratio is tight under UGC. The local-ratio algorithms were later interpreted as primal-dual algorithms via an LP relaxation by Chudak, Goemans, Hochbaum, and Williamson (1998). All known $2$-approximation algorithms for FVS have been via local-ratio and primal-dual methods, and in a quest to obtain a new LP rounding algorithm, it was conjectured (Fiorini 2021) that the Strong-Density polyhedron developed by Chudak, Goemans, Hochbaum, and Williamson has an extreme point property: every basic feasible solution to the LP has a variable with value at least $1/2$. We prove this conjecture. We also consider a related Strong-Edge-Density polyhedron and show the same extreme point property. The advantage of this polyhedron is that it admits a polynomial-time separation oracle and also a compact extended formulation. These results lead to polynomial-time iterative rounding $2$-approximation algorithms. The proof of the extreme point property is of independent technical interest and key ideas in the proof were suggested by AI tools.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Chandra Chekuri, Shubhang Kulkarni. 2026-09-03. An iterative rounding $2$-approximation for Feedback Vertex Set via AI-assisted proof of an extreme point property. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04414

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS