arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.04225

The Trade-off Was in the Labels: Causal Supervision for Turn-Aware Streaming ASR

Abstract

A voice agent must decide, moment to moment, whether the user has finished; silence rarely settles it: a caller reading a phone number pauses mid-digits, a one-word "Stop!" ends a turn, a long question carries pauses longer than real turn-gaps. A voice-activity detector plus a silence timeout (the deployed default) cannot separate these, because within-turn pauses routinely exceed between-turn gaps; what distinguishes them is whether the words so far form a complete thought: what a recognizer computes to produce a transcript. We present the first open training recipe and benchmark for turn-aware streaming ASR: a small LoRA adapter on Qwen3-ASR-0.6B, trained in hours on one GPU, that transcribes, detects end-of-turn from meaning and silence, handles dictation, and grounds transcription in context. On a deployment-matched benchmark it reaches 0.97 boundary recall at 0.39 s median latency with 0.3 false fires per speech-minute, replicated on a fresh test set; no silence timeout reaches this point. The recipe rests on one principle: every streaming-decision label must be computable from input up to the decision point. Offline corpora violate it, encoding the future; such clairvoyant labels manufactured oscillation and a phantom recall-versus-precision trade-off, exposed when one appended second of silence raised a "broken" model's end-of-turn recall from 0.10 to 1.00. The same leak recurred with context: an always-matching biasing prefix became a copied shortcut (40% intrusion), and counterfactuals disagreeing with the audio cut this to 0.8% while keeping most of a +28.9 pp entity-recall benefit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bojie Li, Noah Shi. 2026-07-12. The Trade-off Was in the Labels: Causal Supervision for Turn-Aware Streaming ASR. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04225

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

LLMs and Speech: Integration vs. Combination

In this work, we study different approaches to utilize large language models (LLMs) for automatic speech recognition (ASR). Specifically, we compare the tight integration of an acoustic model (AM) with the LLM ("speech LLM") to the traditional way of combining AM and LLM via shallow fusion and provide ablations on the effect of different label units and LLM sizes. For tight integration, we further examine the effect of attention interfaces, encoder downsampling, and length normalization. Furthermore, we investigate joint recognition with a CTC model to mitigate hallucinations of speech LLMs and present effective optimizations. We train and evaluate on LibriSpeech and Loquacious and additionally evaluate on the HuggingFace ASR leaderboard. Across model sizes, we find that shallow fusion consistently outperforms tight integration of AM and LLM on in-domain data, highlighting the importance of strong shallow-fusion baselines when evaluating speech LLMs for ASR. On the more heterogeneous HuggingFace ASR leaderboard, however, the integrated prefix LLM achieves lower average WER than shallow fusion, with gains concentrated on out-of-domain corpora.

eess.AS

Vaani Benchmark V1.0: An Inclusive Multimodal Benchmark Dataset for Hindi

Benchmarking is critical for the systematic evaluation of machine learning systems. While several open-source datasets are available for Hindi, existing benchmarks remain limited in terms of modality, geographic diversity, demographic representation, and transcription robustness. We introduce an inclusive, multimodal Hindi benchmark dataset collected from 102 districts across India. The dataset consists of spontaneous speech elicited using image prompts and recorded under real-world acoustic conditions across diverse demographic groups. Each audio segment is associated with the image prompt that elicited it and is annotated with three independent transcriptions, enabling multi-reference evaluation that accounts for permissible orthographic and lexical variations. We show that single-reference evaluation overstates errors, while multi-reference evaluation provides a more robust, inclusive, and realistic assessment of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. The pairing of each utterance with its eliciting image further enables image retrieval evaluation using both speech and text queries. We evaluate multiple multimodal embedding models for image retrieval and report their performance on the combined speech--image and text--image retrieval tasks. The results reveal a performance gap between text-based and audio-based retrieval, with text-based retrieval consistently achieving higher performance.

eess.AS

Cover First, Disagree Softly: Rethinking Mismatch-First Active Learning for Frame-Level Audio Classification

Sound event detection relies on frame-level strong labels whose annotation is expensive. Active learning addresses this problem by selecting the audio segments whose labels help the classifier most. One of the prevailing acquisition strategies for this task, mismatch-first farthest-traversal (MFFT), combines the disagreement between two classifiers and the diversity of the selected segments through hard sequential decisions. It selects whole groups of high-disagreement segments first and spreads only the remaining budget by farthest traversal. On two multi-label datasets we show that this design is blind to the similarity among the selected segments and fails under low budgets, with every mismatch-first variant ending below the plain geometric strategy it builds on. We propose mismatch-weighted facility location (MW-FL), which spends the entire budget through a disagreement-weighted coverage objective that penalizes similarity among the selected segments. The disagreement signal from MFFT is used to obtain the nonnegative weights of this facility-location objective, using fixed smoothing without dataset-specific tuning. Experiments across two geometric mechanisms with three ways of using disagreement show that coverage of the selected segments is the dominant factor, hard disagreement gating of selection is harmful on both mechanisms, and soft disagreement weighting helps on top of coverage. MW-FL attains the best area under the learning curve on both datasets.

eess.AS