arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.03246

What is Smoothness?

Abstract

Smoothness of a function on the real line is reflected in the decay of its Fourier transform, which suggests that smoothness of a function in $L^2(G)$ for a group $G$ should mean concentration of the Fourier coefficients at low frequency. Such a reading presupposes an ordering of the irreducible representations of $G$, but for non-abelian $G$, no ordering is canonical. Given a symmetric generating set $S$, the Laplacian of the associated Cayley graph is block diagonal over the dual, and we order the irreps by the mean of the eigenvalues in each block. This produces an ordering function $\omega:\widehat{G}\to\mathbb{R}$ that depends only on the pair $(G,S)$. This function is bounded between zero and two, vanishing only at the trivial representation and achieving the upper bound exactly when the Cayley graph is bipartite. We then ask how much freedom the construction has. Within the class of operators satisfying natural axioms, the induced orderings are exactly the real functions on the dual vanishing at the trivial representation and agreeing on conjugate pairs, and the orderings coming from inversion orbits of conjugacy classes form a basis for them. We cut the freedom down further by requiring two additional inputs: nonnegativity of the class weights and a declaration of which group elements count as uniform incremental changes, which pins the operator to the Cayley-Laplacian up to positive scale. We observe that the construction persists for compact groups even though the Cayley graph does not, and we extend the theory to finite sets carrying a transitive group action, where the acting group selects which frequencies exist and the generating set orders them. The answer to the title question is therefore that smoothness is a property of a function together with a choice of group and generating set, not of the function alone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zachary P Bradshaw. 2026-09-03. What is Smoothness?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03246

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Whittaker supermodules over Lie superalgebras

In this paper, we develop a general theory of quasi-Whittaker supermodules over Lie superalgebras induced from an arbitrary ideal. We determine the quasi-Whittaker vectors in universal supermodules, establish an irreducibility criterion, and classify several families of irreducible supermodules. The odd part produces a new irreducibility phenomenon absent from the Lie algebra setting. As applications, we determine all irreducible quasi-Whittaker supermodules over the $N=1$ super Schr\"odinger algebra and the $N=1$ $\frac{3}{2}$-conformal Galilei superalgebra, and over the complete spectrum-generating superalgebra in a special case.

math.RT

Rankin--Selberg integrals of opposite conductor--one newforms

Let $F$ be a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic zero and let $n\geq2$. For $r=n,n+1$, let $\Pi_r$ be an irreducible tempered representation of ${\rm GL}_r(F)$ of conductor one and with trivial central character. We evaluate the Rankin--Selberg integral of opposite newforms in $\Pi_{n+1}\times \Pi_n$ explicitly and show that its central value is nonzero. As an application, this implies a case of Disegni--Zhang's conjecture on the nonvanishing of local relative characters.

math.RT

Obstructions to Jacobi-Finiteness of Quivers with Potentials

We show that Jacobi-finite potentials need not exist on finite $2$-acyclic quivers. Our main tool is a matrix-valued Golod--Shafarevich--Vinberg inequality for quotients of completed path algebras by finitely many, possibly nonhomogeneous, topological relations. Applied to cyclic derivatives, it yields a potential-dependent obstruction to the finite-dimensionality of completed Jacobian algebras. We then construct a purely quiver-level criterion excluding every Jacobi-finite potential on a given quiver, and exhibit a family of quivers for which every potential has an infinite-dimensional Jacobian algebra.

math.RT