arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.02977

Learning Multiband Signals and Fourier-sparse Signals

Abstract

We consider efficient algorithms to learn multiband signals and Fourier-sparse signals. A mutliband signal has a Fourier transform supported by a bounded number of intervals, say $I_1 \cup I_2 \cdots \cup I_n$. There is a long line of research on multiband signals. In particular, Avron et al. showed an efficient reconstructing algorithm whose sample complexity is almost optimal. However, all previous algorithms for multiband signals consider the reconstructing problem in which the locations of $I_1,\ldots,I_n$ are given as a priori knowledge. On the other hand, although the problem of learning Fourier-sparse signals with $k$ arbitrary frequencies dates at least to Prony in 1795, designing efficient and robust learning algorithms is still an open problem. The state-of-the-art is an efficient algorithm of $\tilde{O}(k^3)$ samples and $\tilde{O}(k^{3 \omega})$ time from the very recent work by Cai et al., while the statistical upper bound is $\tilde{O}(k^2)$ samples. Let $[-1,1]$ be the time window in which the noise is $\ell_2$ bounded. 1. We show an efficient algorithm to recover the locations of the bands $I_1,\ldots,I_n$ in $\hat{x}$ within $\tilde{O}(n+\sum_i |I_i|)$ samples and $\tilde{O}(n+\sum_i |I_i|)$ time. Furthermore, combining this with the reconstructing algorithm by Avron et al. provides an efficient interpolation algorithm within $\tilde{O}(n+\sum_i |I_i|)$ samples. 2. We show that every $k$-Fourier-sparse signal $x$ admits a multiband approximation $z$ whose Fourier transform is of support size $|\mathrm{supp}(\hat{z})|=\tilde{O}(k^2)$. Furthermore, we show an interpolation algorithm for $k$-Fourier-sparse signals with $\tilde{O}(k^2)$ samples and $\tilde{O}(k^5)$ time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dongrun Cai, Xue Chen, Xiaowei Shao. 2026-09-02. Learning Multiband Signals and Fourier-sparse Signals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02977

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS