arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.02961

Architecture-dependent Effects of Trade-offs on Evolutionary Navigability and Epistasis

Abstract

The structure of the genotype-phenotype map plays a central role in determining how populations move through fitness landscapes, yet less is known about how this structure interacts with environmental constraints and fitness trade-offs. Here, we study evolution on a tunable multilayer genotype-phenotype map in which binary genotypes are transformed through successive feed-forward layers before being evaluated by phenotype-level fitness functions. We explicitly model the phenotype to fitness transformation in order to compare an emergent trade-off fitness with a no-trade-off control. We explore different map architecture as models of more and less complex genotype-phenotype relationships by tuning the genotype length and number of layers. We find that ruggedness and navigability have a complex, architecture-dependent relationship. Landscapes with few local maxima can still have low navigability for wide and shallow maps, and navigability is high even at mean values of ruggedness for wide and deep maps. Trade-offs increase navigability in wide and shallow maps, while their effect is muted in other architectures. The effect of trade-offs on epistasis depends on evolutionary history. While trade-offs change which mutational neighborhoods are sampled by evolution, the background degree of epistatic interactions is set by map architecture. Finally, we use our framework to investigate micro-evolution of high-fitness populations and show that temporal covariance in allele-frequency changes can arise from the internal structure of a rugged genotype-phenotype map, producing signatures that resemble short-term alternating selection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nandita Chaturvedi. 2026-09-02. Architecture-dependent Effects of Trade-offs on Evolutionary Navigability and Epistasis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02961

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Evolution as fitness landscape navigation: concepts, measures, and emerging questions

Fitness landscapes are mappings between genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness that shape evolution. In recent years, empirical work and theoretical models have greatly advanced our understanding of how populations navigate rugged fitness landscapes. Here, we provide a timely review of the theoretical aspects of this field. Its rapidly growing literature employs a wide range of terms, which are sometimes used ambiguously or inconsistently. We therefore begin by defining the major concepts and the field's vocabulary, highlighting our own terminology choices wherever needed. We then review key results on the relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability for genotype-fitness maps, highlighting several complex and sometimes counterintuitive connections that have emerged. Further, we review how the conserved structural properties of the underlying genotype-phenotype map, which can lead to the formation of large connected neutral networks of genotypes, influence dynamics on fitness landscapes. We then compare the two levels to study landscape navigation: the level of genotype-phenotype maps and the level of genotype-fitness maps. Our review leads us to propose a new measure of navigability, based on evolutionary outcomes, that is broadly applicable and overcomes limitations of existing measures. Finally, we highlight examples from the smaller body of work that relaxes the common assumption of fitness-monotonic paths on static landscapes, and discuss how this can fundamentally change the nature of fitness landscape navigation. Throughout the review, we identify directions for future work to fill existing gaps and to synthesize the disparate strands of research within the field.

q-bio.PE

Best Matches in Phylogenetic Networks

Best match graphs (BMGs) were introduced in mathematical phylogenetics to describe the concept of closest relatives for related genes (leaves of rooted tree) in different organisms (defining leaf colors). We generalize this concept here to leaf-colored rooted networks, where least common ancestors are in general neither unique nor comparable. We characterize BMGs of rooted networks as those vertex-colored digraphs that are properly colored and satisfy an easy-to-check condition that we call the sicor-in-hub property. BMGs can be recognized in linear time and an explaining network can be constructed in quadratic time. Analogous results are obtained for reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs), where an edge $\{x,y\}$ corresponds to pairs of vertices with different color that are mutually closest relatives.

q-bio.PE

Exact Counts of Binary Phylogenetic Networks with Four Reticulations

Phylogenetic networks provide a flexible framework for representing reticulate evolutionary processes, such as hybridization, introgression, recombination, and horizontal gene transfer. However, their combinatorial complexity makes even basic enumeration problems difficult. Building on our previous work for networks with up to three reticulations, we derive an explicit closed-form formula for the number of unrestricted rooted binary phylogenetic networks with four reticulations on \(n\) labeled taxa. Our approach is based on tree-component graphs. We classify the 79 possible component graphs corresponding to networks with four reticulations into ten groups. We then enumerate the networks associated with each group by combining known counts of one-component networks, forests, and networks with fewer reticulations. Summing these contributions yields the desired formula. This result extends the exact enumeration of unrestricted binary phylogenetic networks to four reticulations and further demonstrates the effectiveness of component graphs for systematically organizing and counting increasingly complex network classes.

q-bio.PE