arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.02012

GeoStore: Finding Small Storefronts in Large Scenes -- A Fine-Grained POI Localization Benchmark with Global-to-Local Asymmetric Matching

Abstract

Point-of-interest (POI) localization -- matching a user's close-up storefront photograph against large-scale geo-tagged street-view imagery -- underpins map construction, POI verification, and location-based services. Its closest existing paradigm, visual place recognition (VPR), assumes symmetric, whole-image matching of the same scene at a comparable scale; POI localization instead must match a close-up query, in which the target fills the frame, against wide references in which the same POI occupies only a small, off-center region among visually similar shops, under a substantial capture-domain gap. We introduce GeoStore, to our knowledge the first benchmark dedicated to this asymmetric, fine-grained, open-set formulation, and show that global-descriptor methods tuned for symmetric VPR are systematically limited on it, since a single global vector dilutes the small target. We further propose GLAM (Global-to-Local Asymmetric Matching), which couples a retrieval-anchoring global descriptor with an asymmetric local pathway: each reference is kept as a compact set of pooled region tokens and matched against a single query probe through a learnable soft late interaction; at inference, the same tokens enable a lightweight mutual-nearest-neighbor re-ranking. GLAM surpasses strong global and two-stage baselines on Recall@1/5/10 and mAP, with ~5x smaller re-ranking features and ~two orders of magnitude lower per-pair matching cost than prior local re-ranking. The benchmark and code will be publicly released.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lu Han, Xiting Sun, Hao Wang, Zhiqiang Cao, Ruihuan Du, Ziquan Zeng, Chunlong Lv. 2026-09-02. GeoStore: Finding Small Storefronts in Large Scenes -- A Fine-Grained POI Localization Benchmark with Global-to-Local Asymmetric Matching. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Doc-REFRAG: Rethinking Multimodal Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Real-world knowledge resides in multimodal documents, necessitating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for accurate question answering. However, existing multimodal RAG models are primarily designed for single-image or closed-document settings and exhibit limited accuracy in realistic multi-image scenarios. Moreover, processing numerous retrieved images incurs substantial computational overhead from irrelevant visual tokens. To address these challenges, we introduce DocLongRAG, a large-scale dataset of 343K question--answer pairs, each associated with an average of 37.4 retrieved images to reflect authentic RAG workflows. Building on this dataset, we propose Doc-REFRAG, a question-guided framework that compresses visual tokens into coarse chunks and selectively expands question-relevant ones via a lightweight RL-based selector. Experiments on six benchmarks show that Doc-REFRAG outperforms eleven strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy with significantly lower inference latency. Our resources are available at https://github.com/Collab-Gen/Doc-REFRAG.

cs.IR

RePair: Turning Retrieval Failures into Counterfactual Hard Pairs

Vision-language retrieval with CLIP-style dual encoders achieves strong cross-modal performance, yet practical accuracy often hinges on localized semantic distinctions where top-ranked near misses differ from the true match by a single critical detail. Hard-sample mining can select confusable candidates but cannot construct corrected counterparts; synthetic augmentation can generate novel samples but, without conditioning on actual model failures, targets irrelevant dimensions of hardness. We observe that a top-ranked false positive is a counterfactual scaffold---sharing most of the query's semantics while differing in a localized failure-causing residual. Minimally correcting this residual yields a hard positive of the ground truth in the same modality; the corrected and unedited versions form a hard negative pair that straddles the decision boundary, producing complementary pull--push supervision. We introduce RePair, guided by three principles---Validity, Minimality, and Locality---which mines false positives bidirectionally, applies LLM-guided counterfactual editing, and trains with a local hard-pair contrastive objective. On Flickr30K and COCO30K, RePair outperforms controlled augmentation baselines with only 107K synthetic samples---26\%--75\% fewer than comparable methods---confirming failure-conditioned repair is more data-efficient than error-agnostic augmentation.

cs.IR

DCA-MoE: Spatially Adaptive Cross-Layer Fusion and Density-Routed Experts for Crowd Counting

Crowd counting must recover reliable local density under severe variations in perspective, head scale, occlusion, and background clutter. Although modern counting objectives provide strong spatial supervision, many multi-level decoders still use spatially invariant feature fusion and apply one receptive-field pattern to every location. We propose DCA-MoE, a framework that makes both decisions content dependent while retaining a frozen DINOv3 encoder. Spatially Adaptive Layer Fusion (SALF) predicts position-wise weights over four aligned backbone features, and Density-Routed Multi-Receptive-Field Experts (DR-MoE) assigns each location a soft mixture of local, mid-range, and large-context residual experts. An EBC-style head reconstructs block density, while DMCount supervision and an auxiliary routing-balance term train the decoder without updating the backbone. On the NWPU-Crowd validation split, the strongest paired configuration, based on DINOv3 ViT-L/16, obtains 31.7 MAE and 72.2 RMSE; the matched ViT-B/16 full model obtains a paired 32.2/75.9. Cross-dataset results remain mixed, and several component baselines currently report independently selected minima from a single seed. The evidence therefore supports the feasibility of spatially adaptive fusion and routing, while broader paired and multi-seed evaluation remains necessary for causal attribution.

cs.CV