arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.01931

Agent Flight Recorder: Tamper-Evident Audit Trails with On-Chain Anchoring for Long-Horizon Tool-Using Agents

Abstract

Long-horizon agents execute thousands of actions, resulting in sequential failures rather than isolated errors. When a coding agent deletes a production database or a prompt injection spreads across agents, the incident raises questions of causality, authority, and non-repudiable third-party verification. The Agent Flight Recorder captures each agent action as a structured, canonically serialized event binding eight semantic fields from intent through execution to provenance. Hash chaining and Merkle batching provide tamper evidence and compact inclusion proofs. For cross-organizational disputes where no party's infrastructure qualifies as neutral ground, periodic on-chain anchoring of epoch roots lets any verifier with the disclosed payload and Merkle proof check the record independently, without pre-agreeing on a trusted intermediary. The on-chain footprint is minimal: each anchor stores a 32-byte epoch root and a back-pointer, and no event content touches the chain. We evaluate the system across five cumulative ablation configurations on synthetic agent workloads. The full system adds ~48 microseconds median per-event latency and 512 bytes per event. L2 anchoring costs $2.30 per 100K events at 100-event epochs. The full integrity stack detects edit, delete, reorder, and fork tampering at 100% with zero false positives. Structured forensic queries achieve 1.0 precision on guardrail and delegation lookups where unstructured text search yields 0.013 and 0.077 respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Laurent Bindschaedler, Quentin Botha, Christoph Siebenbrunner. 2026-09-01. Agent Flight Recorder: Tamper-Evident Audit Trails with On-Chain Anchoring for Long-Horizon Tool-Using Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01931

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DUPIN: Attack Learning Is Still Needed! Demonstrating Few-Shot after Unsupervised Pretraining Is A Nimble Forensics Learner

We propose a novel approach to learning-based attack forensics called DUPIN. DUPIN performs unsupervised pre-training on an enormous amount of audit events in the form of provenance graphs. It then proceeds to a few-shot learning stage, leveraging a small number of labeled attack examples to fine-tune its detection capabilities. We pretrain DUPIN on up to 38 - 52 days of audit logs (7.3TB total) and evaluate it against various baselines on 25 APT campaigns across four different data sources, facilitating the scalable evaluation.

cs.CR

Eavesdropping on Goal-Oriented Communication: Timing Attacks and Countermeasures

Goal-oriented communication is a new paradigm that considers the meaning of transmitted information to optimize communication. One possible application is the remote monitoring of a process under communication costs: scheduling updates based on goal-oriented considerations can significantly reduce transmission frequency while maintaining high-quality tracking performance. However, goal-oriented scheduling also opens a timing-based side-channel that an eavesdropper may exploit to obtain information about the state of the remote process, even if the content of updates is perfectly secure. In this work, we study an eavesdropping attack against pull-based goal-oriented scheduling for the tracking of remote Markov processes. We provide a theoretical framework for defining the effectiveness of the attack and of possible countermeasures, as well as a practical heuristic that can provide a balance between the performance gains offered by goal-oriented communication and the information leakage.

eess.SY

SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems

Safe agents can fail together. Multi-agent LLM systems (MAS) move information, state, decisions, and authority across principal boundaries, creating failures that local checks may miss. Without an execution-level view, a multi-agent setting can easily be mistaken for evidence of a genuinely multi-agent security effect. We thus systematize MAS security through an execution-centered analysis of 197 works, covering six interaction interfaces, four adversary positions, seven system-level risks, and eight recurring attack paths. We introduce an A-I-R framework that organizes attacks by adversary position, interaction interface, and resulting system-level risk, unifying otherwise fragmented attack mechanisms across MAS. We organize defenses through a five-part contract covering path target, observation, intervention, trust boundary, and recovery, and identify path closure and recovery as key challenges. We audit 44 evaluation and benchmark works and identify open challenges in isolating interaction effects, designing comparable and diagnostic metrics, supporting reuse across MAS designs, and evaluating open-system operation. Together, these findings motivate an interaction-aware view of MAS security: trace attacks end to end, test whether defenses close those paths, and evaluate system-level effects with appropriate counterfactuals.

cs.CR