Epistemic Sybil Resistance: Multiplying AI Agents Without Multiplying Evidence

Marc Bara

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.01873

Epistemic Sybil Resistance: Multiplying AI Agents Without Multiplying Evidence

Marc Bara

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multi-agent AI systems improve inference by spawning agents and synthesizing reports. But another agent is not another observation: apparently independent reports may descend from the same evidence, and genuinely independent evidence can produce nearly identical reports. We formalize this as an epistemic Sybil problem. A report Z is an epistemic Sybil extension relative to reports R when I(Theta; Z | R) = 0. No report-only aggregator can generally distinguish replication from independent corroboration: identical reports can warrant different posteriors under unobserved ancestry. A Gaussian shared-root model shows common ancestry does not imply complete redundancy. Repeated extraction adds information toward a source-level ceiling, and correlated extraction errors, which a shared base model can induce among independent agents, lower that ceiling further. We test these predictions with more than 20,000 controlled LLM-agent report and extraction calls on synthetic evidentiary documents. Holding one evidence root fixed while report multiplicity rises from 1 to 32 collapses naive posterior coverage from 0.940 to 0.263. Holding report count fixed while evidence-root multiplicity rises from 1 to 16 closes the gap, and the aggregators are statistically indistinguishable at k = 16. The agent's replicate extraction errors are correlated (gamma_cal = 0.719, estimated out of sample), and a correlated-extraction aggregator restores calibration accordingly. A controlled manipulation isolates representation similarity from evidential ancestry. It changes a report-space deduplication mechanism's mean inferred cluster count by 1.425 (95% CI [1.363, 1.485]), whereas a fourfold change in true ancestry changes it by only 0.040 ([-0.045, 0.120]). Collective inference should therefore track evidential ancestry and dependence, not agent or report multiplicity or similarity.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI cs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Marc Bara. 2026-09-01. Epistemic Sybil Resistance: Multiplying AI Agents Without Multiplying Evidence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01873

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subject cs.MA subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MAS-on-the-Fly: In-Context Structural Adaptation of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have emerged as a promising paradigm for complex tasks. However, existing works often rely on manual designs or "one-size-fits-all" automation and lack adaptability after deployment. We study in-context structural adaptation, where structured experience conditions both query-dependent system generation and execution-time reconfiguration without updating LLM parameters. We introduce MASFly, which realizes this adaptation through two complementary mechanisms. First, a retrieval-augmented SOP instantiation mechanism retrieves and adapts successful collaboration patterns to construct a query-specific MAS. Second, an experience-enhanced process supervision mechanism uses a dedicated Watcher agent to monitor execution against prior failure experience and reconfigure the system upon abnormal behavior. Experiments demonstrate that MASFly achieves state-ofthe-art performance, including a 61.7% success rate on TravelPlanner, with strong task adaptability and robustness.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

MAS-ProVe: Understanding the Process Verification of Multi-Agent Systems

Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) built on Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit high variance in their reasoning trajectories. Process verification, which evaluates intermediate steps in trajectories, has shown promise in general reasoning settings, and has been suggested as a potential tool for guiding coordination of MAS; however, its actual effectiveness in MAS remains unclear. To fill this gap, we present MAS-ProVe, a systematic empirical study of process verification for multi-agent systems (MAS). Our study spans three verification paradigms (LLM-as-a-Judge, reward models, and process reward models), evaluated across two levels of verification granularity (agent-level and iteration-level). We further examine five representative verifiers and four context management strategies, and conduct experiments over six diverse MAS frameworks on multiple reasoning benchmarks. We find that process-level verification does not consistently improve performance and frequently exhibits high variance, highlighting the difficulty of reliably evaluating partial multi-agent trajectories. Among the methods studied, LLM-as-a-Judge generally outperforms reward-based approaches, with trained judges surpassing general-purpose LLMs. We further observe a small performance gap between LLMs acting as judges and as single agents, and identify a context-length-performance trade-off in verification. Overall, our results suggest that effective and robust process verification for MAS remains an open challenge, requiring further advances beyond current paradigms. Code is available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/MAS-ProVe.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

FRAC-MAS: A Safe and Explainable Multi-Agent System for Fracture Diagnosis

Fracture detection and its clinical interpretability see notable improvements when deep vision models are integrated with agentic AI architectures. While deep learning models achieve high diagnostic performance, their black-box nature limits clinical adoption. We propose FRAC-MAS, an agentic AI system for automated, explainable, and safe bone fracture detection. The framework combines a stacked ensemble of four vision models with conformal prediction to produce statistically grounded differential diagnoses, while a multi-agent workflow performs independent verification, retrieves clinical guidelines, and generates patient-friendly reports. A pipeline-depth ablation study confirms that our multi-agent critic triages 86.6% of cases into a high-confidence auto-confirmed cohort while escalating uncertain cases, outperforming a single-agent baseline. Patient preference studies against Llama, MedGemma, and Gemini further demonstrate significantly more comprehensible clinical reports. These results suggest that integrating multi-agent critics with conformal guarantees enables safer radiology triage while preserving clinician oversight. More broadly, FRAC-MAS demonstrates how cooperative agentic architectures can serve as auditable, human-in-the-loop decision support systems for safety-critical healthcare. Our code is available at https://github.com/hardik1712/FRAC-MAS, and the website is available at https://frac-mas.vercel.app.

cs.AI↗