arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.01628

Marginal Expected Revenue for Jointly Ranking Auction and Fixed-Price Listings in E-Commerce Sponsored Search

Greg Kocher·Sanjana Arun
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

E-commerce search ranking must balance multiple objectives--relevance, user engagement, and platform revenue--when allocating impression slots to competing listings. Estimating the expected revenue component is well understood for fixed-price items, but becomes challenging when marketplace inventory includes mixed listing formats such as pure auctions and hybrid "Auction with Buy It Now" (ABIN) items, where prices evolve dynamically and the final transaction value is unknown at ranking time. Yet auction and ABIN listings account for a meaningful share of inventory and transaction volume on platforms such as eBay, and are a popular format for individual sellers and for unique items with unclear value. We extend the standard Expected Cost-per-Mille (eCPM) framework to auction and ABIN listings by deriving a marginal eCPM (meCPM) that captures the incremental value of showing one more impression of an item whose price is still evolving. The resulting formulation extends the familiar fixed-price eCPM--which is already inherently marginal--to auction dynamics, allowing unified ranking of fixed-price, auction, and ABIN listings under a single objective. We then describe a practical production implementation that approximates this objective, addressing cold-start challenges by bootstrapping from existing engagement models. Online A/B tests at a large e-commerce platform showed positive revenue gains and statistically significant improvements to user metrics, and the system was deployed to production.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Greg Kocher, Sanjana Arun. 2026-08-08. Marginal Expected Revenue for Jointly Ranking Auction and Fixed-Price Listings in E-Commerce Sponsored Search. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01628

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.IR subjectcs.LG subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Shilling Recommender Systems by Generating Side-feature-aware Fake User Profiles

Recommender systems (RS) greatly influence users' consumption decisions, making them attractive targets for malicious shilling attacks that inject fake user profiles to manipulate recommendations. Existing shilling methods can generate effective and stealthy fake profiles when training data only contain rating matrix, but they lack comprehensive solutions for scenarios where side features are present and utilized by the recommender. To address this gap, we extend the Leg-UP framework by enhancing the generator architecture to incorporate side features, enabling the generation of side-feature-aware fake user profiles. Experiments on benchmarks show that our method achieves strong attack performance while maintaining stealthiness.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly isolate its effect on downstream performance. On the other hand, existing retrieval-specific benchmarks often fail to capture fine-grained mathematical relevance, penalizing relevant documents. We address this gap by introducing SABER-Math, the first fully automated benchmark for evaluating mathematical IR without expert annotation. Starting from 283K high-school-level math problems with solutions, SABER-Math builds challenging reranking tasks in three steps: (i) first, LLMs extract concise solution summaries and mathematical topics for each problem; (ii) then, per-query relevant documents are discovered using ontology topic-based and lexical solutions-summary-based similarities, and (iii) finally, a Swiss-style LLM preference tournament produces fine-grained relevance ratings for the documents. We evaluate lexical retrievers, specialized mathematical retrieval systems, and recent embedding models. We find that while modern embedding models substantially outperform classical and math-specific baselines, even the strongest systems struggle in symbol-heavy domains like Algebra and Calculus. Importantly, we show that general-purpose IR benchmarks such as MTEB do not reliably predict mathematical performance, especially for recent embedding models, highlighting the need for math-specific retrieval benchmarks.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

When Literature Data Mislead Artificial Intelligence in Materials Discovery

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly treats scientific literature as a data source for building databases, training predictive models, and guiding discovery. Yet literature-derived datasets often assume that reported experimental values are internally consistent and directly reusable. Here, we analyze this assumption using solid electrolyte (SE) conductivity data as a representative materials-science case. By tracing values from source articles to curated datasets, we identify recurrent text-figure mismatches, ambiguous axis annotations, unit inconsistencies, and missing measurement context. These discrepancies are often numerically plausible and therefore difficult to detect through routine preprocessing, but they can propagate as structured label noise during database construction and machine-learning reuse. A cross-database example shows how ambiguous reporting can create a 100-fold conductivity error. Our analysis reframes data accuracy as an infrastructure requirement for artificial-intelligence-driven discovery and motivates traceable reporting, curation, and validation practices for reusable scientific data. Keywords: AI for science; Data reliability; Scientific databases; Structured label noise; Literature-derived data; Materials informatics; Solid electrolytes

cs.IR↗