arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.01146

StainPresetNet: Stain Preset Network for Fast Multi-to-Multi Stain Normalization

Abstract

Stain normalization reduces color variations caused by variations in staining protocols and imaging conditions, thereby enhancing computer-aided diagnostic system performance. Traditional methods derive mapping relationships from individual or limited reference images through pixel-wise transformation, offering style flexibility but suffering from inaccurate color mapping extraction. While existing deep-learning-based approaches achieve accurate dataset-wide color mapping through complex neural networks, they face challenges including computational inefficiency, artifact generation, and fixed normalization directions requiring model retraining for directional changes. To address these limitations, we propose StainPresetNet - a novel framework that combines structural preservation with dataset-level color mapping while maintaining computational efficiency. Our method implements pixel-wise normalization guided by preset reference images, enabling multi-directional adaptability without retraining. Evaluations on cytopathology and histopathology datasets demonstrate that StainPresetNet achieves superior color mapping accuracy compared to conventional methods, effectively improves classifier generalization in diagnostic tasks, and reduces computational overhead by 90\% versus existing deep learning approaches. The proposed preset-guided mechanism facilitates flexible adjustment of normalization directions through simple reference image replacement, overcoming the directional rigidity of current deep-learning-based solutions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hongtao Kang, Die Luo, Li Chen, Jing Cai, Junbo Hu, Xiuli Liu, Shenghua Cheng. 2026-09-01. StainPresetNet: Stain Preset Network for Fast Multi-to-Multi Stain Normalization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01146

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A survey of AI-generated voices and their detection

The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate highly realistic human voices has advanced rapidly. These technologies power accessibility tools, virtual assistants and creative applications, but they also enable harmful uses, including impersonation, fraud and disinformation. Recent incidents of voice cloning scams targeting businesses and political leaders underscore the urgent need for robust safeguards. Unlike image and video deepfakes, the detection of synthetic voices poses unique challenges due to the complexity of phonetics, prosody and auditory perception. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of AI voice generation and detection methods, encompassing both the technical foundations and the latest state-of-the-art advances. This study also identifies key open challenges, benchmark resources and future directions to make this survey useful for future researchers.

cs.AI

When Saying No Makes Better Videos: Designing Dual Gatekeeping for Pedagogically Grounded AI Content Creation

To prevent the adoption of aesthetically polished but pedagogically flawed AI content, we study a video authoring pipeline featuring two layers of structured refusal. The first layer empowers educators to iteratively reshape AI scripts based on multimedia learning theory, while the second employs automated metrics to flag violations in instructional coherence and narrative-visual synchronization. While neither layer is exhaustive, their synergy ensures that principled resistance--the act of deferring AI output until it meets rigorous standards--becomes a catalyst for higher quality. Evaluation combining a study with 23 educators across 3 topics and automated metrics across 7 topics drawn from established science and philosophy curricula shows that both layers independently improve the same instructional dimensions, suggesting that thoughtful resistance and generative AI are not opposites but partners.

cs.AI

Measuring Similarity between Artistic and AI Generated Images using Siamese Neural Networks

AI-generated art has sparked debates around potential plagiarism, as these images may closely resemble existing artworks. This research quantifies the similarity between original pieces and AI-generated counterparts, particularly those produced by the Stable Diffusion XL Refiner 1.0. We use Siamese Networks with frozen CLIP encoders and cosine similarity optimized through triplet loss. A dataset of paired original and generated images was built using image-to-image generation and custom prompts, enriched with semantic descriptors and BLIP-2 captions. Prior studies report up to 81\% style replication and 90\% visual similarity. Our results show high discriminative performance: training accuracy reached 99.9\%, and the best model configuration achieved 99.4\% test accuracy with strong inter-class separation ($δμ$ = 0.677), demonstrating the effectiveness of our semantic-visual embeddings.

cs.CV