A Checklist to assess the energy and carbon impacts of ML/AI applications in Earth System Modeling

Filippo Dainelli; Amirpasha Mozaffari; Marina Castaño; Aina Gaya i Àvila; Lluís Palma Garcia; Alessio Melli; Oscar Dimdore Miles; Amanda Duarte

arXiv · 2609.00847

A Checklist to assess the energy and carbon impacts of ML/AI applications in Earth System Modeling

Filippo Dainelli·Amirpasha Mozaffari·Marina Castaño·Aina Gaya i Àvila·Lluís Palma Garcia·Alessio Melli·Oscar Dimdore Miles·Amanda Duarte

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As machine learning and artificial intelligence find their way into nearly every aspect of climate, weather, and Earth system modeling, it is worth pausing to consider what our design decisions imply for the science and for the computational resources we consume. A growing body of literature addresses the ethical and sustainable development of ML/AI, yet translating these principles into day-to-day research practice remains a challenge as most of best practices are dispersed across multiple studies and commentaries. Here, we distill these discussions into a practical checklist that ML/AI and Earth system science practitioners can use to assess and reduce the environmental footprint of their own applications, organised around the successive stages of the model development pipeline. We complement the checklist with a selection of metrics drawn from the literature for estimating the energy consumption and carbon footprint of a project. For each question, we point to concrete examples and actionable suggestions from recent literature, aiming to bridge the gap between aspirational principles and the decisions researchers face at every stage of the development cycle.

Explore related subjects

physics.ao-ph cs.AI cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Filippo Dainelli, Amirpasha Mozaffari, Marina Castaño, Aina Gaya i Àvila, Lluís Palma Garcia, Alessio Melli, Oscar Dimdore Miles, Amanda Duarte. 2026-09-01. A Checklist to assess the energy and carbon impacts of ML/AI applications in Earth System Modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00847

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subject cs.LG subject physics.ao-ph subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

NORi: An ML-Augmented Ocean Boundary Layer Parameterization

NORi is a machine learning (ML) parameterization of ocean boundary layer turbulence that is physics-based and augmented with neural networks. NORi stands for neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) Richardson number (Ri) closure. The physical parameterization is controlled by a Richardson number-dependent diffusivity and viscosity. The neural ODEs are trained to capture the entrainment through the base of the boundary layer, which cannot be represented with a local diffusive closure. The parameterization is trained using large-eddy simulations in an a posteriori fashion, where parameters are calibrated with a loss function that explicitly depends on the actual time-integrated variables of interest rather than the instantaneous subgrid fluxes, which are inherently noisy. NORi conserves tracers by design, uses realistic nonlinear thermodynamics, and demonstrates excellent prediction and generalization capabilities in capturing entrainment dynamics under different convective strengths, background stratifications, rotation, and wind forcings. NORi is shown to simulate the seasonal evolution of the boundary layer at Ocean Weather Station Papa with similar performance to the state-of-the-art two-equation k-epsilon closure. When implemented in a double-gyre simulation, it is numerically stable for at least 100 years, despite only being trained on two-day horizons, and can be run with time steps as long as one hour. Combining highly expressive neural networks with a physically grounded base closure proves to be a robust paradigm for designing parameterizations for climate models: data required and training cost are drastically reduced, inference performance can be directly optimized as a primary objective, and numerical stability is implicitly promoted through training.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

PCSDiff: Diffusion-Based Bias Correction and Super Resolution Toward Practical Operational Medium-Term Precipitation Forecast

Medium-range precipitation forecasts are impaired by persistent systematic biases, lead-time-dependent error accumulation, and coarse spatial resolution, restricting their reliability for flood-drought risk assessment. Existing AI correction techniques lack dedicated modeling for multi-day dynamic bias evolution and proper meteorological constraints, often generating over-smoothed rainfall structures, and cannot meet operational deployment demands. This work introduces PCSDiff, a cascaded task-decoupled diffusion framework targeting 10-day precipitation bias correction and downscaling. To jointly counteract temporal error drifts and reconstruct physically plausible local precipitation details, PCSDiff integrates the Precipitation Intensity-aware Multi-branch Decoder (PIMD) module for dynamic multi-day error mitigation using synoptic-temporal features, followed by a two-phase conditional diffusion super-resolution module to restore fine-scale precipitation patterns. Evaluated against CMA-CRA observations over China after global-data training, PCSDiff cuts RMSE by 16.1% and lifts ACC by 13.9% relative to raw ECMWF forecasts at 3-10-day lead times, and consistently outperforms mainstream deep-learning baselines on both general and extreme-precipitation metrics. Benefiting from a streaming inference pipeline, our method achieves low-latency rolling forecasting for practical meteorological operations.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Uncertainty-Aware End-to-End AI Weather Forecasting: Disentangling Observation and Model Contributions

End-to-end weather forecasting systems produce skillful global gridded and station forecasts directly from raw Earth observations, replacing the numerical weather prediction pipeline, including data assimilation, at a fraction of its cost. These systems are deterministic and issue no uncertainty. Here we render the Aardvark Weather model probabilistic by attaching one stochastic mechanism to each component: learned, input-dependent noise at the observation encoder, capturing aleatoric uncertainty inherited from the observing system, and Monte Carlo dropout in the processor, capturing epistemic uncertainty in the learned dynamics. The resulting nested ensemble attributes forecast spread to the two sources through a law-of-total-variance decomposition, cross-checked by withholding observation streams. Probabilistic finetuning significantly improves the mean forecast, by 4.2% on average across variables and lead times. The ensemble is calibrated against ERA5 through the medium range (spread-skill ratio 0.98), keeps station RMSE within 2.4% of the deterministic model while beating it in CRPS at every lead time, and trails the operational ECMWF ensemble. The encoder branch behaves as observation-driven uncertainty. Component-attributed uncertainty makes end-to-end forecasts more transparent, a step toward observation-driven digital twins of the atmosphere.

physics.ao-ph↗