arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2609.00761

Agent-Enhanced Heterogeneous Graph RAG for Academic Question Answering

Abstract

Academic question answering requires reasoning over heterogeneous scholarly graphs, where queries range from simple attribute lookups to multi-hop inference across author--paper--venue structures. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems struggle in this setting due to three limitations: (1) fixed retrieval strategies that do not adapt to varying query complexity, (2) the absence of sufficiency evaluation leading to incomplete or misaligned evidence, and (3) a lack of structured verification against graph facts. To address these issues, we propose an agentic heterogeneous graph RAG method that transforms the three core stages of the RAG pipeline into explicit agentic decision steps. A query-aware retrieval agent analyzes query type and selects an appropriate graph traversal strategy; a sufficiency-aware reranking agent assesses evidence completeness and adaptively expands the retrieved subgraph; and a graph-grounded verification agent checks entity, relation, and attribute correctness before finalizing the answer. Experiments on heterogeneous graphs constructed from OpenAlex and DBLP suggest that our method consistently outperforms strong LLM, graph-augmented RAG, and agent-based baselines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Runsong Jia, Mengjia Wu, Ying Ding, Jie Lu, Yi Zhang. 2026-09-01. Agent-Enhanced Heterogeneous Graph RAG for Academic Question Answering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3774904.3792960

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Algorithmic Simplification for Million-Vertex Diffusion History Reconstruction

Diffusion history reconstruction infers latent node states between sparse observations of SI or SIR processes. HERMES combines parameter fitting, a learned graph-neural proposal, and feasibility-aware Markov chain Monte Carlo. We remove these stages one at a time and evaluate each version on all 12 canonical datasets. The final method uses deterministic mean-field forward-backward inference, threshold decoding, and fixed rates. This fixed-rate variant, Battus-Z, achieves mean macro-F1 of 0.8726 and NRMSE of 0.1010, compared with published HERMES aggregates of 0.8692 and 0.1483. The benchmark pins the final observed frame before scoring, so we also exclude all observed frames. Under this metric, Battus-Z obtains macro-F1 0.8431 and NRMSE 0.1181. Thus, the learned proposal, MCMC, and fitting stages can be removed while retaining the published aggregate quality on the evaluated HERMES benchmark and scoring protocol. A CUDA implementation processes generated histories with up to 4.84M vertices on LiveJournal and 117M edges on Orkut. On the same CUDA backend, Battus-Z reduces the geometric-mean algorithm interval relative to fitted Battus by 5.1x for SI and 20.3x for SIR. Its event-weighted causal-violation rates are 7.50% for SI and 8.77% for SIR; graph-constrained decoding remains future work.

cs.SI

Convergence and acceleration of a nonlinear fixed-point iteration for computing the Fitness Centrality of general graphs

We establish the global convergence of the (non-homogeneous) Fitness Centrality algorithm for general graphs, deriving an explicit convergence bound for the corresponding fixed-point iteration. Furthermore, we show how the convergence can be dramatically improved by Anderson acceleration and by switching to Newton's method once a sufficiently good approximation to the fixed point has been found. The efficacy of this strategy is illustrated by numerical experiments on different types of graphs.

math.NA

GroupDPO: Memory-Efficient Group-Wise Direct Preference Optimization

Preference optimization is widely used to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with preference feedback. However, most existing methods train on a single positive-negative pair per prompt, discarding additional supervision available in preference datasets that typically contain multiple candidate responses. Motivated by this limitation, recent work explores group-wise preference optimization, which jointly contrasts multiple responses for the same prompt, but its empirical behavior and scalability remain underexplored due to the memory overhead of group-coupled objectives. In this work, we present a unified empirical and systems study of group-wise preference optimization and develop a memory-efficient implementation for group-coupled objectives. By instantiating first-order linearization with objective-specific per-response coefficients, our implementation preserves first-order gradients while decoupling samples during backpropagation, substantially reducing peak memory usage and enabling scalable training with larger groups. Across offline and online settings, we show that leveraging multiple responses consistently outperforms single-pair training. Furthermore, incorporating a negative log-likelihood (NLL) term on positive responses is critical for both performance gains and training stability.

cs.CL