Test or Run? Scheduling Jobs of Unknown Length

Václav Rozhoň

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.30911

Test or Run? Scheduling Jobs of Unknown Length

Václav Rozhoň

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A machine faces many jobs whose lengths are hidden. Spending one unit of time to inspect a job may reveal a short job that should be finished now, or it may reveal nothing useful while every other job waits. When should the machine keep looking, and when should it start working? We study natural variants of this question and provide optimal algorithms in both the worst-case and instance-optimal frameworks. The resulting algorithms are often quite simple, which may make them useful in practice.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Václav Rozhoň. 2026-08-31. Test or Run? Scheduling Jobs of Unknown Length. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30911

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.DS subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

DS-Lighting: Making Agent Harnesses Explicit for Data-Science Automation

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise for automating data-science workflows, yet their end-to-end performance depends critically on the agent harness that represents tasks, manages execution state, constrains output artifacts, and provides evaluation feedback. Existing data-science agents often leave this harness implicit, making results difficult to reproduce, compare, and attribute across heterogeneous tasks. We introduce DS-Lighting, a unified harness toolkit that makes harness design explicit for data-science automation. DS-Lighting decomposes the harness into four reusable layers: data, workflow, execution, and evaluation, and represents diverse agents as executable operator programs that support both predefined pipelines and adaptive search. We further integrate multiple open-source data-science benchmarks into an MLE-Bench-style task format, enabling controlled comparison under a shared task interface, sandboxed runtime, and metric protocol. Experiments across agents, harnesses, models, and ablations show that explicit harness design improves reproducibility, comparability, and reliability, while reducing avoidable system-level failures in end-to-end data-science workflows. Our code is available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/dslighting

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Disproving the Greedy Superstring Conjecture

The shortest common superstring problem is to find the shortest string that contains every string in a given set as a substring. It is conjectured that the greedy algorithm that repeatedly selects a pair of strings with maximum overlap and merges them is a $2$-approximation algorithm, and this conjecture had remained open for nearly four decades. In this paper, we disprove this conjecture and show that the approximation ratio of this algorithm is at least $9/4$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

The Bron-Kerbosch Algorithm with Vertex Ordering is Output-Sensitive

The Bron-Kerbosch algorithm is a well known maximal clique enumeration algorithm. So far it was unknown whether it was output sensitive or not. In this paper we partially answer this question by proving that the Bron-Kerbosch Algorithm with vertex ordering, first introduced and studied by Eppstein, Löffler and Strash in "Listing all maximal cliques in sparse graphs in near-optimal time. International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010" is output sensitive.

cs.DS↗