arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.30210

Frontier vision-language models have overtaken young adults at detecting AI-generated portraits -- but not their calibration

Sunwhi Kim·Sunyul Kim·Meounggun Jo·Jini Tae
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AI image generators now create face portraits that are hard to tell from real photographs. Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed to flag such images. We benchmarked 19 VLMs on the same 198 face portraits -- real photographs and identity-matched ChatGPT-4o and Imagen 3 versions -- under the same task as our earlier study of 1,667 adults (85% correct overall; accuracy fell steeply with age). The June-2026 cohort of 14 models only matched adults in their 20s-30s. Four weeks later the ceiling broke. Among five July-2026 releases under the identical protocol, gpt-5.6-sol reached 92.8% balanced accuracy (five-draw mean 92.1%), clearly above adults in their 20s (88.5%), and claude-fable-5 detected every AI image while averaging 91.9%. Model sensitivity now exceeds young adults decisively (d' up to 3.4 versus ~ 2.4). What has not been overtaken is human calibration. Model criteria spread from c = -1.10 to +1.45 while humans sit near zero at every age; both new leaders are biased (+0.44, -0.97), and only a few mid-ranked models approach the human balance. Changing the labelled examples still flipped about one answer in four. The best machines now out-see young adults here, without matching the human balance between suspicion and trust.

Explore related subjects

cs.HCcs.CV

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sunwhi Kim, Sunyul Kim, Meounggun Jo, Jini Tae. 2026-08-31. Frontier vision-language models have overtaken young adults at detecting AI-generated portraits -- but not their calibration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30210

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CV subjectcs.HC subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

No Pixel Left Behind: Filling Gaps in Anime Colorization

Animation production workflows often involve digital colorization of line art, where small unpainted regions ("gaps") frequently occur and remain an underexplored challenge. We conducted a formative study in Japanese animation (anime) pipelines and found that while the paint bucket tool is widely used for base coloring, tiny enclosed areas are frequently overlooked, resulting in time-consuming manual detection and filling. We introduce GapFill, a tool grounded in professional practices that reduces the effort of gap detection, zooming, and color selection. Our deep-learning method suggests appropriate fill colors by referencing surrounding regions, leveraging the flat-color nature of anime-style images. In a user study with 13 professional colorists, our system improved performance and usability in gap-filling tasks over conventional methods. The study also suggested that prediction accuracy alone is not the primary factor for usability, that appropriate colors can be contextually ambiguous, and that GapFill can complement existing tools depending on users' trust in new AI-powered assistance.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizations

Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic, requiring the active interrogation of interactive environments. Existing benchmarks are predominantly constrained to static imagery and one-shot question answering and fail to capture the epistemic demands of this domain, where evidence is frequently occluded, distributed across linked views, or conditionally revealed through user agency. In this paper, we introduce InSight, a benchmark for agentic claim verification over interactive visualizations. The dataset consists of 21,349 claims derived from human-authored analytical narratives and grounded in fully interactive web-based environments. Agents must navigate these environments to determine whether a natural language claim is supported, refuted or not verifiable given the available evidence. Unlike traditional evaluations, InSight treats interaction traces as intrinsic proxies for reasoning, enabling a rigorous audit of how models seek and synthesize visual evidence. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, revealing that interactive verification remains a non-trivial challenge. We release InSight at https://github.com/maevehutch/insight.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input

Alignment teaches vision-language models (VLMs) to avoid expressing demographic biases, and when gender is clearly visible they largely succeed. Far less is known about ambiguous inputs (a worker in full gear, a figure seen from behind), cases common in practice yet rarely studied. We find that minimal prompting pressure exposes occupation-gender defaults when prompting ambiguous input images, with models collapsing to male even for strongly female-stereotyped occupations. But do these outputs reflect what models actually encode internally? We introduce LALS (Latent Association Leaning Score), a zero-shot metric that projects visual-token activations into the model's text-embedding space to measure concept associations per token and layer. Across 15 occupations, over 800 gender-ambiguous images, and four VLMs, internal representations and outputs often become systematically decoupled: models often encode a female association internally yet output male. Layer-wise analysis reveals an asymmetric filter: male signal amplifies end-to-end while female signal peaks mid-network and is suppressed before generation. A color ablation shows that culturally loaded visual cues such as clothing color further modulate these internal associations.

cs.CV↗