arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.28654

Orientations without transitive arcs for cubic graphs and phylogenetic networks

Abstract

An $st$-orientation of an undirected graph $G$ is an acyclic digraph with a single source $s$ and a single sink $t$ that can be obtained from $G$ by assigning a direction to each edge. The classical problem of deciding if an undirected graph $G$ has an $st$-orientation can be solved efficiently. On the other hand, deciding if an $st$-orientation of $G$ exists that does not have any transitive arc is NP-complete, even if each vertex of $G$ has degree at most four. Here we show that this last decision problem remains NP-complete if $G$ is cubic, which settles an open question by Binucci et al. (2025). We obtain NP-completeness for two variants of the problem: (i) $s$ and $t$ are fixed and given as part of the input and (ii) $s$ and $t$ can be chosen freely. We then use these results to investigate the computational complexity of a problem that arises in computational evolution. Specifically, we show that the problem of deciding if an unrooted binary phylogenetic network has an orientation as a rooted binary phylogenetic network without any shortcuts (the analog of a transitive arcs in phylogenetics) is NP-complete. Our results connect the two (mostly) distinct research areas of orienting undirected graphs and orienting unrooted phylogenetic networks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Janosch Döcker, Simone Linz. 2026-08-20. Orientations without transitive arcs for cubic graphs and phylogenetic networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

It's Hard to PArcK

We show that Partizan Arc Kayles (PArcK), a generalization of Domineering to graphs, is PSPACE-complete via a reduction from Positive CNF and with recently-discovered techniques for creating PArcK positions with high temperature. The reduction uses only red and blue edges.

cs.CC

Discrepancy of geometric incidences

We study the combinatorial (red-blue) discrepancy of finite point sets with respect to hyperplanes and, more generally, bounded-complexity affine algebraic sets. We prove that every $n$-point set in a real Euclidean space admits a red-blue coloring for which every affine algebraic set of dimension at most $D$ and degree at most $k$ has discrepancy at most $n^{\frac12-\frac{1}{2(D+1)}-\varepsilon}$ for some $\varepsilon=\varepsilon(D,k)>0$. This gives a polynomial improvement over the straightforward VC-dimension bound $\tilde O(n^{\frac12-\frac{1}{2(D+1)}})$. In the opposite direction, we construct $n$-point sets in $\mathbb R^d$ whose discrepancy with respect to hyperplanes is $\tildeΩ(n^{\frac12-\frac{1}{d+1}}),$ extending the point-line discrepancy lower bound of Chazelle and Lvov. We present further applications of our methods in communication complexity, concerning separation between randomized communication cost and deterministic communication cost with access to equality oracle.

math.CO

Equality cases of the Stanley--Yan log-concave matroid inequality

The \emph{Stanley--Yan} (SY) \emph{inequality} gives the ultra-log-concavity for the numbers of bases of a matroid which have given sizes of intersections with $k$ fixed disjoint sets. The inequality was proved by Stanley (1981) for regular matroids, and by Yan (2023) in full generality. In the original paper, Stanley asked for equality conditions of the SY~inequality, and proved total equality conditions for regular matroids in the case $k=0$. In this paper, we completely resolve Stanley's problem. First, we obtain an explicit description of the equality cases of the SY inequality for $k=0$, extending Stanley's results to general matroids and removing the ``total equality'' assumption. Second, for $k\ge 1$, we prove that the equality cases of the SY inequality cannot be described in a sense that they are not in the polynomial hierarchy unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to a finite level.

math.CO