arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.28111

CC4M: Code Clone Analysis and Visualization for Microservices

Gen Kawamata·Yuki Ota·Norihiro Yoshida·Shiyu Yang·Erina Makihara·Katsuro Inoue
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Microservice architecture supports software evolution by decomposing a system into small, loosely coupled services that can be deployed independently. Contrary to the expectation of high modularity, prior studies have reported that code clones exist across service boundaries, some of which are co-modified in the same version. Such clones may require changes to be propagated across service boundaries, thereby undermining service independence and increasing maintenance costs. However, existing tools do not support microservice-aware clone analysis. We present CC4M, a microservice-aware clone analysis and visualization tool. CC4M detects and enriches clone pairs with service-boundary, co-modification, file-category, and metric information. The enriched clones are visualized in an interactive scatter plot with explicit service boundaries, supporting metric-based filtering to prioritize clones with potentially higher maintenance impact. Using an open-source microservice application, we illustrate how CC4M helps identify the potential impact scope of code changes. A demo video and the tool are available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xOIQPFbkUg and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21204195, respectively.

Explore related subjects

cs.SE

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gen Kawamata, Yuki Ota, Norihiro Yoshida, Shiyu Yang, Erina Makihara, Katsuro Inoue. 2026-08-28. CC4M: Code Clone Analysis and Visualization for Microservices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28111

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.SE subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Impact of GenAI on the Future of Requirements Engineering

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), are transforming how we design and build systems by increasing access to domain knowledge and by providing automation support to software engineering (SE). As implementation becomes less expensive through generalist SE agents, engineering effort shifts away from writing correct code and toward expressing, curating, verifying, and evaluating requirements. In this paper, we survey the state of the art in AI for requirements engineering (RE) research leading up to the transformation, before reviewing advances in LLMs. We survey two subsequent research areas: prompt programming, which treats LLM instructions as a program in SE vernacular, and generalist SE agents, which combine multiple LLM advances to yield semi-autonomous processes that complete SE tasks. Finally, we explore the future of requirements engineering along two axes: matters changing how we interact with requirements through the SE process, and matters changing how requirements are experienced by software developers and stakeholders more broadly, including end-users. This article aims to inform how RE researchers can navigate this transformation in the selection of future research priorities.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

SE-GoS: Self-Evolving Graph-of-Skills for Skill Library at Scale

Modern LLM agents increasingly rely on reusable skills, yet as skill libraries scale to thousands of entries, effective retrieval becomes a bottleneck. Graph-of-Skills (GoS) addresses this challenge by exploiting dependency-aware graph structure for scalable skill retrieval, while SkillDAG further demonstrates that skill graphs can accumulate execution-backed structure online. However, these approaches leave open whether historical execution traces can be systematically distilled into a better retrieval graph that generalizes to unseen tasks. We present Self-Evolving Graph-of-Skills (SE-GoS), a training-free framework that evolves an existing GoS graph from execution traces while preserving the original retrieval pipeline. SE-GoS performs three complementary updates: topology evolution that discovers and prunes skill relationships from execution evidence, edge-weight evolution that reinforces retrieval-relevant relationships based on historical effectiveness, and description evolution that optimizes retrieval-facing skill descriptions using execution feedback. Across three LLMs on SkillsBench, SE-GoS consistently improves task reward while reducing input tokens relative to full skill loading, with gains varying across model families. In a representative setting, one evolution round improves reward from 52.4\% to 59.4\% while reducing input tokens by approximately one-third relative to full skill loading, and the resulting graph transfers to a disjoint held-out split with a 5.4-point improvement over the static GoS baseline. These results show that skill graphs can be improved from execution experience without model training, changes to the retrieval algorithm, or modifications to skill content, turning a static retrieval graph into an evolving retrieval infrastructure.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

From Prompting to Engineering: A Research Agenda for Prompt Engineering in Software Engineering

Prompt engineering is increasingly used across Software Engineering (SE) activities, including requirements analysis, coding, testing, documentation, repository analysis, and planning. Yet prompts and related instruction artifacts are often created and evolved through task-specific and informal practices, with limited support for their systematic evaluation, management, traceability, and governance. To examine how SE can contribute to the maturation of these practices, we organized a structured community discussion at the First International Workshop on Empirical Prompt Engineering for Software Engineering (PROMPT-SE), co-located with EASE 2026. Participants discussed current prompting practices, challenges to their adoption and evaluation, and future directions for integrating prompt engineering into software development. We synthesized these discussions into five areas: prompt artifacts and standardization; evaluation and benchmarking; lifecycle integration; human-AI collaboration and skills; and governance, privacy, and technical debt. Based on these areas, we outline a research agenda to move prompt engineering from predominantly ad hoc interactions toward more systematic, maintainable, evaluable, traceable, and governable SE practices.

cs.SE↗