arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.27942

CASTANET: Causality-Aware Spatio-Temporal Adversarial Network Using Traffic Incident Effects

Abstract

Predicting non-periodic traffic congestion caused by sudden incidents (e.g., accidents and road damage) is crucial for advanced intelligent transportation systems. However, incident-driven congestion is difficult to forecast because incidents are extremely sparse, occur at specific times and locations, and have heterogeneous impacts depending on the traffic context. While recent deep learning approaches have significantly improved periodic traffic forecasting, their performance on non-periodic congestion remains limited, partly because incident records are not explicitly incorporated and their occurrence is strongly biased in space and time. To address these challenges, we propose CASTANET, which integrates spatio-temporal graph neural networks and causal treatment effect estimation to utilize incident records while mitigating selection bias. Experiments on real-world traffic data and accident records from Tokyo, which we treat as incidents, show that CASTANET reduces RMSE by 4.0% overall compared to the best baseline and by 10.1% on incident-conditioned evaluation, with gains reaching 14.55% under severe congestion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Toshiya Kitahara, Ryu Shirakami, Koh Takeuchi, Hisashi Kashima. 2026-08-28. CASTANET: Causality-Aware Spatio-Temporal Adversarial Network Using Traffic Incident Effects. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27942

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Reducing Catastrophic Risk from AI with Systematic Monitoring and Evaluation of Rogue AI Progression

This article presents a structured framework of behavioral indicators that may signal progression toward potentially catastrophic threats from artificial intelligence systems. We adopt a pragmatic approach, inspired by established methodologies in cybersecurity and national security. By establishing clear metrics, indicators, and thresholds across multiple dimensions of AI capability and behavior, this framework enables researchers and policymakers to implement evidence-based monitoring protocols.

cs.CY

Impact of AI Search Summaries on Website Traffic: Evidence from Google AI Overviews and Wikipedia

Search engines increasingly display AI-generated answers above organic links, potentially displacing traffic to upstream publishers. We estimate the impact of Google's AI Overviews (AIO) on Wikipedia's search traffic using AIO's staggered geographic rollout and Wikipedia's multilingual structure. Our difference-in-differences design compares monthly external-search referrals to English Wikipedia articles with referrals to the same articles in German and French, and finds that default AIO availability reduced English search traffic by 5.45% and 4.82%, respectively. Our results suggest that answer-producing digital intermediaries can materially reallocate attention away from informational publishers, with implications for content monetization, search platform design, and policy.

cs.CY

The End of AI Exponentiation: Fluttering Inside and Outside AI Bubble

The exponentiation of Artificial intelligence (AI) in the recent past has entered a transformative era that has been driven by the growth in large language models (LLMs), large-scale compute infrastructures, and autonomous reasoning systems. However, the rapid acceleration of AI has increasingly shown technological, societal, economic, ethical and infrastructural challenges associated with peak data limitations, rising computational demands, synthetic data recursion, valuation inflation, and societal instability. The traditional scaling paradigms that have powered the modern AI systems are gradually encountering friction in sustaining continuous exponential growth. This paper views ``the end of AI exponentiation,'' thus exploring how it flutters inside and outside the bubble, where instability emerges within the AI ecosystem through compute and data-center races, speculative investments, and the rat-race toward superintelligence, and outside the ecosystem through labor disruption, governance concerns, public uncertainty, and geopolitical acceleration surrounding future intelligent systems and infrastructures globally.

cs.AI