arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.27755

Undecidability of Adjacent Equality for Insertion, Shuffle, and Crossover Language Operations

Abstract

We study a family of language operations based on insertion, shuffle, and crossover and investigate the undecidability of adjacent equality together with finite convergence and associated spectrum questions. Insertion and shuffle operations on formal languages arise in formal language theory, models of concurrency, and biologically inspired computation. This paper studies a different question from the usual closure problem, specifically whether an increasing sequence of languages generated by repeated insertion, or by increasing the permitted degree of bounded shuffle, reaches an instance of adjacent equality after finitely many stages. We show that several such adjacent equality questions are undecidable. In particular, reaching such an adjacent equality event is undecidable for each of the following: iterated insertion of a regular language into a context-free language; bounded shuffle of a regular language with a context-free language as the bound increases; and the corresponding self-insertion and self-bounded-shuffle hierarchies for context-free languages. The new reductions proceed directly from the undecidability of context-free-language universality, using separator-delimited block constructions and, for self-operations, an absorbing regular language of guard violations. Earlier trace-based proofs relied on mortality and uniform halting. More generally, we investigate finite-stage equality and stabilization (persistent equality) in hierarchies generated by insertion and bounded shuffle. In addition to giving substantially simpler proofs of earlier undecidability results, we obtain general criteria for one-step equality, develop new reductions for self-insertion, and identify several open problems, including structural questions concerning insertion depth and degree whose resolution determines whether adjacent equality necessarily implies permanent stabilization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Charles E. Hughes. 2026-08-27. Undecidability of Adjacent Equality for Insertion, Shuffle, and Crossover Language Operations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27755

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

CARVY-FL: Client Anticlustering for Robust Voting in Provably Secure Federated Learning

Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training without directly sharing raw data, but remains vulnerable to malicious clients. Voting-based FL improves robustness by partitioning clients into groups, training one model per group, and aggregating predictions by plurality voting. However, under class-disjoint non-IID data, distribution-oblivious grouping can yield highly variable certified accuracy (CA). We propose CARVY-FL, which estimates client distribution types from one-epoch model updates and uses anticlustering to increase within-group distributional diversity. Under a fixed grouping, CARVY-FL retains the voting-based CA guarantee while increasing vote margins. Experiments on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST show higher CA than FLCert. Under BadNets with model replacement, CARVY-FL improves the AUC of 100-ASR by 11.1% and 14.9%, respectively.

cs.CR

DART-FL: Burst-Aware Multitask Federated Learning under Dynamic Inference Demand at the Edge

Edge intelligence systems increasingly require model training and online inference to coexist on resource-constrained devices, while inference demand can vary substantially across tasks over time. This creates two coupled challenges: sufficient computation must be reserved for inference to maintain service-level objectives (SLOs), while the remaining training capacity should adapt to task-specific demand so that frequently requested tasks can improve earlier during training. We propose an SLO-aware, demand-driven multitask federated learning framework (DART-FL) that jointly adapts the inference-training resource split and task-level training emphasis. At each scheduling interval, DART-FL uses the inference backlog and profiled service capacity to determine the minimum resource allocation required for inference. The remaining training capacity is then distributed across tasks using a queue-aware DPP-inspired scheduler, and the resulting task allocations are mapped to dynamic loss weights. This allows tasks experiencing higher inference demand to receive greater training emphasis in earlier communication rounds. Clients train a shared backbone with task-specific heads, and the complete multitask model is aggregated through FedAvg. We evaluate DART-FL using Stanford Cars and Oxford Flowers 102 under both synthetic and real Alibaba trace-derived workloads. Results show that DART-FL dynamically adapts the inference-training resource split to time-varying inference demand and shifts the learning progress of high-demand tasks toward their burst periods, improving model accuracy when those tasks are frequently requested while maintaining comparable long-term multitask performance.

cs.LG

On smallest synchronizing terms over constant alphabets

We show a subexponential lower bound on the reset threshold of synchronizing deterministic finite tree automata (DTA) over alphabets of just two symbols. This significantly improves the previous one, which was quadratic in the number of states. Our result also narrows the gap towards the lower bound for DTA over alphabets that grow linearly with the number of states, as well as the best known upper bound, both of which are currently exponential.

cs.FL