arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.27724

A Mixed-Behavior Vote Model for Multimedia Subjective Quality Votes, Means, and Variances

Abstract

The relationship between subjective test vote variance and vote mean (or MOS) is well-studied, and the mathematically admissible vote variance region has been previously defined. We propose a reduced admissible variance region called the Unimodal Variance Region (UVR) that better describes real subjective rating behavior of multimedia. Further, subjective vote variance is often modeled as parabolic. We explain that, in practice, the parabolic model often violates the admissible region in the variance vs. MOS plane and we propose alternatives that respect the admissible region. We also present a parametrized random process to model votes that mixes voting processes and produces a realistic range of vote variances within the UVR at any desired MOS. This process was inspired by and comports with voting behavior that is observed in many subjective tests. By modeling vote variance from a subjective experiment, this vote model offers additional interpretable insights into voting behavior observed in a given experiment. We present example results from 16 datasets spanning speech, image, and video subjective quality experiments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jaden Pieper, Stephen D. Voran. 2026-08-27. A Mixed-Behavior Vote Model for Multimedia Subjective Quality Votes, Means, and Variances. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27724

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SonicCaps: Large-Scale Diverse and Fine-Grained Captioning for Improved Audio-Retrieval

Recent advances in audio-language modeling have been driven by large-scale audio captioning datasets. However, existing datasets remain limited by low semantic diversity, generic descriptions lacking acoustic details, and one-to-one audio-caption mappings that poorly reflect the inherent ambiguity of auditory perception. We introduce SonicCaps, a large-scale audio captioning dataset comprising ~15M captions paired with ~700k audio clips, generated using a multi-modal large language model (Qwen3-Omni) conditioned on both audio and text. To explicitly promote diversity, we generate around 24 captions per audio via structured prompt engineering and few- shot generation, spanning main descriptions, rephrased variants (verbosity, style) and semantic tags. Human evaluation shows that SonicCaps is rated significantly higher than existing captioning datasets, with fine-grained analyses indicating that our captions are perceived as more descriptive and precise, which strongly correlates with quality judgments. Finally, training CLAP models on SonicCaps with a multi-caption sampling strategy consistently improves audio retrieval and zero-shot classification, with stronger generalization across public and commercial benchmarks. We release both SonicCaps and two specialized CLAP models on hugging face: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Zineb/SonicCaps.

cs.SD

Variable-Length Audio Fingerprinting

Audio fingerprinting converts audio to much lower-dimensional representations, allowing distorted recordings to still be recognized as their originals through similar fingerprints. Existing deep learning approaches rigidly fingerprint fixed-length audio segments, thereby neglecting temporal dynamics during segmentation. To address limitations due to this rigidity, we propose Variable-Length Audio FingerPrinting (VLAFP), a novel method that supports variable-length fingerprinting. To the best of our knowledge, VLAFP is the first deep audio fingerprinting model capable of processing audio of variable length, for both training and testing. Our experiments show that VLAFP outperforms existing state-of-the-arts in live audio identification and audio retrieval across three real-world datasets.

cs.SD

MuSP-Bench: Advanced Multimodal Benchmarking of Music Understanding across Score and Performance

Musicians commonly communicate music through scores and performances. Scores encode musical intent, while performances realize it in sound. To investigate whether models can meaningfully engage with both modalities, we introduce MuSP-Bench, a human-authored benchmark of 490 questions targeting understanding across Musical Scores and Performances. The benchmark distinguishes itself by spanning score-based, performance-based, interpretive, and long-horizon reasoning across classical piano and orchestral works. We evaluate frontier multimodal large language models under multiple input conditions. Our results show that these models struggle substantially to understand scores, while facing even greater challenges when reasoning about performance audio. The benchmark is available at https://musp.vaclis.net/.

cs.MM