arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.23344

Towards Actionable Surgical Team Dynamics: from Teamwork to Counterfactual Annotations

Vincenzo Marco De Luca·Antonio Longa·Andrea Passerini
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modeling team interactions in high-stakes environments such as operating rooms is critical for understanding how coordination, communication, and individual behaviors shape team performance and safety outcomes. Existing datasets in this domain are often fragmented across modalities, annotation schemes, and formats, limiting their ability to support integrated analyses of real-world collaborative processes. We address this limitation by introducing an extended multimodal dataset for surgical team interaction analysis, built from real operating room recordings. Starting from an existing corpus, we construct an analysis-ready version of the data by providing speaker diarization, transcripts, and multi-level annotations capturing team performance, interaction processes, and individual characteristics. Team performance is assessed using a standardized surgical teamwork evaluation protocol, while interaction quality and individual attributes are annotated through structured rating schemes covering collaboration, group dynamics, and non-technical skills. To further support the study of coordination breakdowns and performance variability, we introduce counterfactual annotations that describe plausible alternative team outcomes in the presence of observed interaction failures, enabling analysis of how specific behavioral patterns may relate to different trajectories of team performance. In addition, we provide structured temporal and relational representations designed to support computational modeling of teamwork processes and the design of AI-assisted collaborative systems. The dataset is designed to support the study of how individual actions, interaction patterns, and team-level processes jointly contribute to team outcomes in surgical settings, providing a unified resource for analyzing collaborative behavior in high-stakes domains.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vincenzo Marco De Luca, Antonio Longa, Andrea Passerini. 2026-08-24. Towards Actionable Surgical Team Dynamics: from Teamwork to Counterfactual Annotations. https://doi.org/10.1145/3834580.3838751

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗