Learning the Center and Radius of Wasserstein Ambiguity Sets for Data-Driven Decision Making

Junjie Guo

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.18123

Learning the Center and Radius of Wasserstein Ambiguity Sets for Data-Driven Decision Making

Junjie Guo

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (DRO) is commonly built around the empirical distribution, with the ambiguity radius selected from a concentration bound. Although this construction provides useful statistical guarantees, it can be conservative and does not fully exploit predictive information about the underlying distribution or the difficulty of a particular decision problem. We develop a more flexible framework in which a predictive model determines the nominal distribution and a separate model estimates a data-dependent radius. The key requirement is not that the ambiguity set be centered at the empirical distribution, but that it contain the unknown data-generating distribution with the desired probability. We establish finite-sample guarantees and asymptotic consistency for arbitrary learned centers, derive tractable reformulations for non-uniform discrete predictive distributions, separate predictive-model and scenario-discretization errors, and prove stability under simultaneous perturbations of the center and radius. We further characterize the oracle conditional-quantile radius as the smallest conditionally valid rule and introduce a split-conformal procedure for finite-sample marginal calibration. Experiments on newsvendor problems, synthetic portfolios, distribution shifts, and real financial data show that learned and calibrated ambiguity sets can improve reliability, but do not automatically yield smaller radii or better decisions. Overall, the proposed framework treats calibration as a practical mechanism for reliable decision making rather than a universal guarantee of improved optimization performance.

Explore related subjects

math.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Junjie Guo. 2026-07-16. Learning the Center and Radius of Wasserstein Ambiguity Sets for Data-Driven Decision Making. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AdGT: Decentralized Gradient Tracking with Adaptive Per-Agent Stepsizes

In decentralized optimization, gradient-tracking methods typically rely on a single global stepsize. This choice can be conservative when agents have local objectives with different smoothness constants, since the stepsize must remain stable for the agent with the largest smoothness constant. This paper proposes AdGT, a decentralized gradient-tracking method in which each agent adapts its own stepsize using local gradient variation and a single global safety factor. The method reduces fixed-stepsize tuning effort and allows agents to exploit local smoothness information during the iterations. For smooth and strongly convex local objectives over undirected networks, we prove that the analyzed AdGT update converges linearly to the exact consensus optimizer. We also study two adaptive stepsize updates that use changes in the gradient-tracking direction. We characterize when the corresponding candidate determines the stepsize and prove conditional lower and upper stepsize bounds and linear convergence under an additional relative tracking-disagreement condition. Experiments on logistic regression, ridge regression, synthetic quadratic problems, and a linear-regression benchmark against state-of-the-art decentralized solvers show that AdGT often reaches a given accuracy in fewer iterations or gradient evaluations than tuned fixed-stepsize GT and the tested baselines, especially under heterogeneous local smoothness. In the topology experiments, each tested AdGT update uses one common safety factor across all graphs, whereas the fixed GT stepsize is tuned separately for each graph and seed.

math.OC↗

arXiv2026

Brockett cost function for symplectic eigenvalues

The sum of symplectic eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of symmetric positive-definite matrices in the sense of Williamson's theorem can be computed via minimization of a trace cost function under the symplecticity constraint. Optimal solutions to this problem only offer a symplectic basis for the symplectic eigenspace corresponding to the sought symplectic eigenvalues. In this note, we introduce a Brockett cost function and investigate its properties and the connection with the symplectic eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the considered matrix. Specifically, we prove that any stationary point consists of symplectic eigenvectors, characterize the saddle points and global minimizers based on which the trace minimization theorem for the symplectic eigenvalues is re-established, and the nonexistence of local nonglobal minimizers is justified.

math.OC↗

arXiv2026

Riemannian Bilevel Optimization with Gradient Aggregation

We study bilevel optimization on Riemannian manifolds when the lower-level solution set is a positive-dimensional submanifold, so that implicit differentiation fails. We propose Riemannian Bilevel Descent Aggregation (RBDA), which extends bilevel descent aggregation to manifolds. Its inner loop aggregates the lower-level descent direction with the upper-level gradient under a decaying multiplier, and its hypergradient is the reverse-mode derivative of the unrolled loop. Under geodesic convexity and quadratic growth of the lower level, the inner iterates converge to a point of the optimistic solution set at a polynomial rate. Approximate minimizers of the objective with a finite number of inner iterations converge to minimizers of the optimistic value. In the experiments RBDA selects the optimistic solution where the implicit and unrolled estimators remain at the initial point or stop at a larger query loss. While each of its outer steps costs more than that of the unrolled estimator, it attains the highest test accuracy in data hyper-cleaning.

math.OC↗