Optimal Pricing and Hedging of SOFR Derivatives

Teemu Pennanen; Waleed Taoum

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.10711

Optimal Pricing and Hedging of SOFR Derivatives

Teemu Pennanen·Waleed Taoum

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thousands of SOFR derivatives are available in exchanges and OTC, but the market remains illiquid and incomplete. Such a market is beyond the scope of classic risk-neutral approaches that imply linear pricing rules and, at best, approximate hedging strategies whose hedging error may be difficult to quantify. This paper develops an indifference pricing model which is consistent with observed derivative quotes, the agent's financial position and views about the uncertain future as well as risk preferences as described by a convex risk measure. In addition to prices and hedging strategies, the model gives an explicit description of the hedging error and the associated risk. The approach is illustrated numerically using hundreds of CME-listed derivatives to price and hedge unreplicable OTC SOFR derivatives. The indifference prices are computed in less than a minute on a regular PC. We find that the optimal hedging portfolios tend to be sparse but still provide good approximations of the derivative payouts.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Teemu Pennanen, Waleed Taoum. 2026-08-11. Optimal Pricing and Hedging of SOFR Derivatives. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10711

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Confidence intervals for empirical convergence rates of randomised quasi-Monte Carlo, with applications to option pricing

Empirical comparisons of quasi-Monte Carlo rules often report fitted convergence exponents without intervals. We estimate the root mean square error from independent randomisations, fit its log slope over a declared sample-size window, and resample whole randomisations to construct an interval. For a fixed window, we establish asymptotic validity under finite fourth moments and a positive limiting variance. We measure coverage of four interval constructions on integrands with known exponents. With Gaussian errors, all four are compatible with nominal coverage at 128 and 512 randomisations, and jackknife-$t$ already at 32. All four undercover for the two higher-kurtosis families even at 512 randomisations. For differences between slopes, including null and small effects, preserving the dependence between paired randomisations can greatly narrow intervals, but it does not ensure nominal coverage. In option pricing, a steeper slope and a smaller error at a fixed budget can rank rules differently. Preintegration lowers a digital Asian option's exponent by about 0.5 in every tested window. For a barrier option it reduces the error six- to ninefold while changing the exponent by less than four hundredths. An arithmetic basket's gain grows with sample size. A geometric basket remains a ridge function as assets are added, limiting its use as a dimension benchmark. For multi-asset Asian options, different bases within a degenerate PCA eigenspace can change the measured exponent, in a direction that depends on the payoff.

q-fin.PR↗

arXiv2026

Yet another asymptotic formula for implied volatility

We derive a first-order representation of Black-Scholes implied variance in a continuous local martingale model. Total implied variance is the conditional expectation of the quadratic variation of the log price given its terminal value, up to a smaller-order term, for bounded standardized log-strikes. The framework incorporates small volatility-of-volatility, fast mean-reverting, and short-maturity asymptotics.

q-fin.PR↗

arXiv2026

(Early) AI Compute Asset Pricing

Compute (computing power) is a scarce, capital-intensive input at the center of the AI economy. Compute capital expenditure and service flow already exceed 1% of U.S. GDP and are growing rapidly. The price of compute reflects uncertainty over AI adoption. The announced launch of compute futures turns this uncertainty into a tradable risk, raising questions on the pricing of a new asset class. We provide an early asset-pricing framework for compute. We begin by discussing the underlying compute rental market and its indexation. We then turn to pricing: 1) direct no-arbitrage links between futures prices and current spot prices fail due to the non-storable nature of compute, 2) synthetic futures prices from existing term rental contracts are likely upper bounds on true futures prices and, 3) upon financialization, futures prices will be investors' expectations of spot prices at expiration net of a risk premium. Using synthetic futures as stand-ins before the compute futures market launches, we construct the first compute futures return panel sorted by GPU generation and maturity. Our preliminary evidence is consistent with a positive compute risk premium, suggesting hedging pressure on the part of compute providers.

q-fin.PR↗