arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.07519

From Survey Personas to LLM Agents: A Generative Agent-based Simulation of Mobility Policy Preference Dynamics

Ali Torkayesh·Julia Offermann·Regina Gimpel·Linda Engelmann·Katrin Arning·Martina Ziefle·Sandra Venghaus
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly used to simulate socially complex and interaction-driven tasks. However, most existing studies rely on hand-crafted personas. Since persona design strongly shapes how agents interpret context and make decisions, developing empirically grounded agent profiles is a significant aspect in this underexplored research area. To address this limitation, we propose a survey-grounded generative agent-based modeling (GABM) simulation framework that translates real survey respondents into generative LLM agents. The main objective of our framework is to demonstrate how careful persona design enables realistic simulation of decision-making using LLMs for facilitating behavioral experiments. We illustrate the framework's applicability through a case study of mobility policy preference dynamics in Germany, focusing on public support for phasing out new internal combustion engine vehicles, which is part of the European Union's net-zero target. Our benchmark is based on 514 survey respondents, each translated into a natural-language persona, grounded in demographic characteristics, political orientation, mobility behavior, fuel experience, and climate-related attitudes. The simulation goal is to examine how support evolves over time, how agents switch positions across rounds, and how responses differ across survey-grounded personas under changing social and policy contexts.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ali Torkayesh, Julia Offermann, Regina Gimpel, Linda Engelmann, Katrin Arning, Martina Ziefle, Sandra Venghaus. 2026-08-15. From Survey Personas to LLM Agents: A Generative Agent-based Simulation of Mobility Policy Preference Dynamics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07519

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we need an AI-resilient society- Profiling Large Language Models

Three generations of software have transformed the role of artificial intelligence in society. In the first, programmers wrote explicit logic. In the second, neural networks learned programs from data. In the third, large language models turn natural language itself into a programming interface. These shifts reach far beyond computer science, reshaping how societies generate knowledge, make decisions, and govern themselves. While generative adversarial networks introduced the era of deepfakes and synthetic media, large language models have added a new class of systemic risks. This report performs "mindhunting" for LLMs by applying a forensic-psychology profiling methodology to characterize AI based on documented features, e.g., hallucinations, bias and toxicity, sycophancy, fabrication and confabulation, knowledge without understanding, discontinuity and the inability to learn from experience, jagged intelligence, shortcuts and fractured representations. The resulting profile reveals an "entity" that confabulates fluently, amplifies its users' biases, possesses encyclopedic recall without causal understanding, and erodes the competence of those who depend on it. The implications extend to institutional erosion across law, academia, journalism, and democratic governance. To address these challenges, this report proposes a four-pillar framework for AI resilience: (i) cognitive sovereignty, which preserves the capacity for independent judgment, (ii) measurable control, which translates ethical commitments into enforceable standards and red lines, (iii) partial autonomy, which maintains human agency at critical decision points, and (iv) openness to guarantee transparency and accessibility (open-source, open-access, and open-data). This report is an updated and extended version of arXiv:1912.08786v1.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Generative AI performance in core undergraduate mathematics: a curriculum-level case study

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT are transforming the educational landscape, prompting reconsideration of traditional assessment practices. In parallel, universities are exploring alternatives to in-person, closed-book examinations, raising concerns about academic integrity and pedagogical alignment in uninvigilated settings. This study systematically investigates the performance of GenAI on typical mathematics questions from across a first-year mathematics curriculum. Adopting an empirical approach and utilising current examination questions as a proxy for course content, we generate, transcribe, and blind-mark GenAI submissions to eight undergraduate mathematics assessments, spanning the entirety of the first-year curriculum. By combining independent GenAI responses to individual questions, we enable a meaningful evaluation of GenAI performance, both at the level of modules and across the first-year curriculum. We find that GenAI attainment is at the level of a first-class degree, though current performance can vary between modules. Further, we find that GenAI performance is remarkably consistent when viewed across the entire curriculum, significantly more so than that of students in invigilated examinations. Our findings evidence the pressing need for redesigning assessments in mathematics in the era of generative artificial intelligence.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

LLM-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of LLMs as a Context-Conditioned Distribution

We argue, with systematic empirical evidence, that a large language model's political ideology is not a fixed point, but a conditional distribution $\mathbb{P}($position$\mid$context$)$ over a real political space. We evaluate nine current LLMs using a unified measurement framework anchored by VAA-CHES projection models, which map responses onto three validated dimensions (lrgen, lrecon, galtan) across six contextual axes. Our findings reveal high sensitivity to context: persuasive framing and under-represented languages displace coordinates by up to 0.57 and 0.52 units, respectively, while chain-of-thought reasoning often amplifies rather than dampens paraphrase instability. Despite this local plasticity, the model cohort occupies a remarkably narrow Overton envelope overall, occupying roughly one-third the spread of major European parties. Supported by a multi-trait multi-method (MTMM) analysis, we conclude that a single point cannot summarize LLM political behavior; it must be characterized as a shape. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/sakhadib/LLM-Ideoplasticity.

cs.CY↗