arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2608.06932

Educational Short Videos: Bibliometric Trends, Thematic Structure, and Operationalisation

Abstract

Educational short-video research spans disciplines, platforms and learning contexts, but the same label is applied to resources differing in function, activity, context and evaluation, complicating comparison and evidence synthesis. This study mapped the development, thematic organisation and operationalisation of educational short-video research. We analysed 2,169 records indexed in Web of Science and Scopus up to 11 June 2026 using bibliometric analysis, non-negative matrix factorisation topic modelling and structured content analysis. Publication output increased sharply from the mid-2010s but remained dispersed across outlets. Among 16 first-level topics, Skill Development in Educational Contexts was the largest, forming the structural core of the field, while topic overlap was predominantly pairwise. Video-Based Health Interventions for Attitude Change and Cognitive Load and Engagement in Instructional Video Design combined positive recent growth with comparatively high citation visibility, whereas Social Media Engagement Strategies for Education emerged as a rapidly growing direction. Knowledge/Achievement and Engagement/Motivation were the most widely represented outcome domains, and experimental and synthesis designs were more common among identifiable records in health-related topics. Indexed descriptions most often foregrounded intended users, educational uses, learning content, and interactivity. A representative duration was available for 511 records, but no consistently applied numerical threshold was evident. These findings support a working definition of educational short videos as discrete multimedia messages combining words and visuals and designed or used to promote learning. Shortness should be interpreted relative to educational purpose, content unit and surrounding activity rather than duration alone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yidi Zhang, Jindi Wang, Pedro Bem-Haja, Zhipeng Li, Lei Shi, Thomas K. F. Chiu. 2026-08-07. Educational Short Videos: Bibliometric Trends, Thematic Structure, and Operationalisation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06932

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systems

Current AI evaluation methods, which rely on static, model-only tests, fail to account for harms that emerge through sustained human-AI interaction. As AI systems proliferate and are increasingly integrated into real-world applications, this disconnect between evaluation approaches and actual usage becomes more significant. In this paper, we propose a shift towards evaluation based on \textit{interactional ethics}, which focuses on \textit{interaction harms} - issues like inappropriate parasocial relationships, social manipulation, and cognitive overreliance that develop over time through repeated interaction, rather than through isolated outputs. First, we discuss the limitations of current evaluation methods, which (1) are static, (2) assume a universal user experience, and (3) have limited construct validity. Drawing on research from human-computer interaction, natural language processing, and the social sciences, we present practical principles for designing interactive evaluations. These include ecologically valid interaction scenarios, human impact metrics, and diverse human participation approaches. Finally, we explore implementation challenges and open research questions for researchers, practitioners, and regulators aiming to integrate interactive evaluations into AI governance frameworks. This work lays the groundwork for developing more effective evaluation methods that better capture the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems.

cs.CY

Enhancing Large Language Model-Based Systems for End-to-End Circuit Analysis Problem Solving

LLMs have shown strong performance in data-rich domains such as programming, but their reliability in engineering tasks remains limited. Circuit analysis is particularly challenging because it requires both multimodal understanding and precise mathematical reasoning. This paper presents an enhanced end-to-end circuit problem-solving framework using Gemini 2.5 Pro as the backbone model for scalable engineering-education applications. We systematically evaluate Gemini 2.5 Pro on undergraduate circuit-analysis problems and identify two major failure modes: circuit-recognition hallucinations, especially source-polarity errors, and reasoning-process hallucinations, such as incorrect current-direction assumptions. To reduce recognition errors, we integrate a fine-tuned YOLO detector with OpenCV-based processing to isolate voltage and current sources for polarity re-identification. To mitigate reasoning errors, we introduce an ngspice-driven verification loop that supports iterative refinement with optional human feedback. On 83 problems, the proposed pipeline achieves 97.59% accuracy, compared with 79.52% for baseline Gemini. Across four hand-drawn diagram variations, accuracy improves from 60.61%--71.21% to 89.39%--92.42%, with statistically significant gains (p<0.005). On 43 problems from a different textbook, accuracy increases from 58.14% to 83.72%, further supporting cross-textbook generalizability. Error analysis shows that circuit recognition remains the dominant source of residual failures, particularly under varying diagram representations. Overall, the framework substantially improves the robustness, scalability, and generalizability of LLM-based circuit problem solving for engineering education and practical circuit analysis.

cs.CY

GreenPassport: Request-Level Carbon Accounting for Cross-Border AI Inference

AI inference often crosses regional boundaries as prompts travel to remote data centers and generated tokens return to users. Regional averages cannot represent the resulting differences in serving hardware, electricity, and network delivery. Request-level accounting needs a common boundary for the service, serving site, route, local comparator, uncertainty, and data provenance. GreenPassport Carbon Accounting (GPCA) associates these inputs with each request. It estimates serving and route carbon, then selects a reporting level from the available documentation. Our public-data implementation covers data-center instances, accelerators, model families, electricity mixes, routes, and cloud-region carbon intensity. Against six accounting baselines and four energy-prediction baselines, GPCA reduced median absolute percentage error by 56.3% and median absolute error by 15.5% relative to EcoLogits under the aligned accelerator-energy boundary. It produced zero rule overstatement in the deterministic conformance tests. In the buyer case, the clean-electricity CN-West scenario produced 0.0148 gCO2e per request, 88% below the local service at 0.1220 gCO2e per request.

cs.CY